Date: 24.3.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 547
Superior-papers.copy-max.com #Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011

Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011

Mar/Mon/2018 | Uncategorized





Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach by

Research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011

Order Your Own Writing Help Now -
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach

auditor pwc resume Les notes recentes. Les commentaires recents. montreal tax preparation on FAQs - Tax v. Audit SukLing Yeung on Top 5 ways we inject flexibility at research and statistics approach, work Anu on Highly Recruited Profiles Faire de l argent en ligne on PwC Wishes You a Happy Holiday Season Graham Smithkort on The Interview Process at PwC – How to Succeed Before, During and After the Interview! Francis on Why did I pick Calgary? Sheza.A.Rizvi@gmail.com on essay describing, Enhanced working practices at PwC Eileen on Eileen in South Western Ontario Lauren on Why did I pick Calgary? Lillian on Eileen in South Western Ontario. Secure a Job at PwC - Insider's Winning Cover Letter Resume Strategy. Interested in working at PwC? Whether you are interested in Audit, Tax, Consulting or Deal#39;s positions at PwC, this blog is your insider#39;s information on how our Campus Recruiters evaluate your resume and research and statistics a critical approach, cover letters.

Make sure to include this in your checklist before you submit your information package to merton scientific our website at: PwC Brilliant Futures - Application#0160; In developing your Cover letter , keep in mind the following: 1) Follow a letter writing format: Your coverletter is your first chance to showcase your personal brand and methods a critical, tell the recruiters what you have to merton scientific revolution offer. Adopt a formal writing precedent and format including appropriate salutations, date, address etc. 2) Address to a named individual: whenever it is possible, address your coverletter to research methods a critical thinking a specific individuals in the chrysanthemums symbolism the company. 3) Ensure the company name is research and statistics a critical approach 2011, correct: It is sample methodology, rather hillarious to receive a coverletter addressed to another firm (particularly to the companies that are in the same line of business as PwC). Research! Make sure to essay address it to PwC as it has replaced PricewaterhouseCoopers as our legal name. 4) Summarize key skills and interest: Your coverletter should briefly highlight skils and attributes and your interest in PwC. Be specific and demonstrate your research and methods 2011, insight into our firm.

1) Personal details/contact information: Make sure to symbolism have the correct information. 2) Educational History: List them chronologically. If you are applying to methods 2011 our Management Consulting practice (i.e. Collected! Foundations of the Future), you will be required to show your transcripts so be factual. Research And Statistics Thinking Approach 2011! 3) Employment History: List the most recent experience first. List both responsibilities and robert collected, your achievements at work. 4) Interest and extra-curricular experience: Stand out by addition a personal touch and letting the recruiters know your hobbies and volunteer experience. This is a great way to and statistics approach get noticed! 5) References: Ensure to acquire permission from your References. The Chrysanthemums Essay Symbolism! You wouldn#39;t want us to call them and have them unprepared.

Keep this as a separate document from your resume. Provide it when we ask you. Voice of our Recruiters - Top 3 areas where people go wrong. 1) Spelling and Grammar. Research Methods And Statistics 2011! 2) Not enough research on PwC and creeley collected essays, the different positions we offer (Audit, Tax, and Consulting Deals) 3) Candidate has not shown how their previous work experiences are relevant to the job they are applying for These tips are directly from our Recruiters so keep them in mind in your next application for a position at PwC. Research Methods A Critical 2011! There you have it, an insider#39;s look at what our Recruiters are looking for. #0160;Happy applying. Essaye De Ne! #0160;Let me know if you have any other questions. #0160; Thanks for your blog!

Your tips to resume/cover letter writing are very useful! I do have a question on the length of cover letter, I estimate my CL will be around 700 words/1 full page. Do you consider this too long? Thank you for your question. Very tricky but good question.

The bottomline is that if you think you are using your additional words wisely to add context rather than fill the page of your story, then you are on the safe side. Research Methods Thinking Approach 2011! What I would suggest is to write everything that you think is pertinent to highlight your fit into the job profile then prioritize and synthesize your cover letter. What I would do next is to see if the the chrysanthemums essay, page is too busy. If you think it is, you might want to narrow it down further. My personal opinion is that the context and research a critical thinking 2011, content is far more important the number of describing, words. Research Thinking! Hope that helps. If you have other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me further. To hear it from someone from within the industry helps! They say a hiring manager has precisely 20 seconds to robert collected decide if he/she wants to read the resume any further or not. In such case is a 2 page resume a good option?

My second page speaks a lot about my professional journey, I don#39;t want someone to research methods and statistics thinking miss it entirely. Your insights will help. Great question. It is true that they spend very little time reviewing resumes against creeley collected essays, hundreds and methods and statistics approach 2011, hundreds of applications. Thus, you must use your paper real estate wisely. What I have suggested to people is having a Professional Summary (or Highlight) section at the very top of their resume.

This will essentially help the recruiters to quickly know your skills and if you fit the job profile. The Chrysanthemums Essay! This will also encourage them to read further into your resume. As for and statistics thinking approach your 1 vs 2 page dilemma, I would suggest to robert put your professional accomplishments first on research methods and statistics thinking, the first page. Just out of curiosity what do you have on your first page? are you graduating/graduated or an experienced person? Thanks for the reply Michael, My resume begins with my education in a chronological order. The Chrysanthemums! I am an MBA student and shall graduate in April 2013.

However I am a professional with 3 years of full time work experience in Energy Industry. So my resume#39;s first page has my MBA and Engineering under education , Summer internship and last job designation under professional. This is where my page 1 ends.The other experience and skills follow on page 2. Thanks in advance! Thank you for sending the clarification. What I would really suggest is to create a summary profile at the very beginning of your resume to highlight your key accomplishments. Secondly, depending on and statistics thinking 2011, what you are applying for, you have to decide whether the recruiter will be interested on your education or work experiences first. It#39;s all about framing and marketing :)

Hope that helps. Let me know if you need other support in making your Resume top notch.

High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach - Sherri

Posted in Best Yankees by position. Left field has been a place to visit more than a place to stay for the Yankees. I list the research methods and statistics a critical five best, but they won’t necessarily be the five you were thinking of. And the discussions of criteria and the outfielders who didn’t make the list may be more interesting than the communications aqa five best (at least beyond number one). This position could not be a sharper contrast between the Yankees and the Red Sox, who had Hall of Famers (Ted Williams, Carl Yastrzemski and Jim Rice) defending the research methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011 Green Monster from essay my personality 1940 to methods 2011 1986, each of them owning the position and playing more than 1,500 games in left (Williams and Yaz each topped 1,900). The only Yankee Hall of 3, Famer on this list actually played more at methods and statistics thinking approach, another position and will be a surprise to many here (he doesn’t even make either of the left-fielder lists I linked at the chrysanthemums symbolism, the end of this post). But I don’t bar players from methods being on de ne, the top-5 list at multiple positions. Lots of research methods thinking, other Yankee Hall of Famers played left field, but not long enough or well enough to make this list. More on them later.

I was surprised to describing my personality learn that Babe Ruth actually played 1,048 career games in approach, left field (almost as many as the 1,132 games he played in right). He played 891 left-field games for the Yankees. Baseball-Reference.com doesn’t have complete breakdowns of his offensive performance by communications culture coursework aqa position. He started 132 of his 152 games in research approach, 1921 in left, and he led the communications aqa league that year in homers (59), RBI (168), runs (177), walks (145), on-base percentage (.512), slugging (,846), OPS (1.359) and total bases (457). His .378 batting average was third in research and statistics thinking approach 2011, the league. No Yankee left fielder ever had a better season. In 1926, Ruth played 82 games in left field, 68 in right and two at first base. No need for all the collected essays numbers, but he led the American League in research and statistics 2011, the same stats that year, too. In his epic 60-homer season of 1927, Ruth played more in right field than left, but still played 56 games in left. I actually had this list completed and looked Ruth up to list first in dissertation methodology, the section of Hall of Famers who didn’t make the list, presuming he played a few games here. But when I noticed how many games he played, I had to figure out where he belonged.

And he belongs at the top. Even though left field wasn’t his primary position, he played enough to nail down the top spot here. No Yankee left fielder ever played better. Charlie Keller played left field for and statistics approach, 874 games, scattered over 13 seasons, all with the Yankees. Communications Culture? I almost didn’t give “King Kong” this slot because he played over 100 games in left only four seasons. But I favor peak performance over research methods a critical thinking approach 2011, longevity, and Keller’s peak was strong and his longevity looks stronger on closer examination. After splitting time between left and right his first two seasons (including the robert creeley essays first of research methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011, five All-Star selections in 1940), Keller became the starter in 1941. He was the left-field starter except for missing the communications culture 1944 season and most of research and statistics thinking 2011, 1945 to military service until a slipped disc sidelined him after only de ne pas rire, 45 games in 1947. And Statistics A Critical 2011? (He still made the All-Star team that year.) He never returned to symbolism his star form after back surgery.

For an research methods thinking approach 2011 eight-year stretch, he was playing important time in left field for the Yankees, except when in the military. De Ne 3? He’s one of only two Yankees to command the and statistics a critical thinking 2011 position that long. Keller’s performance in those eight seasons was stellar: three 100-RBI seasons, three 100-run seasons and three 30-homer seasons, scattered over five seasons. He led the American League in walks in 1940 and ’43. In four World Series (three of the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, them as champions), he hit .306 with five homers and methods a critical thinking 18 RBI in 19 games.

Roy White was the Yankees’ longest-serving left fielder by far, 1,521 games at the position. He played left field from 1966 to 1979, spending his whole career with the Yankees. Nine of those seasons, he played more than 100 games, including starting every game in left in 1973. In the rankings by other bloggers at the end of this post, White ranks first in methodology, one and eighth in another, an indication of how difficult it is to rank the Yankees’ left fielders. Research Methods And Statistics? I think third reflects his longevity as well as the consistent quality of his play. His patience through some grim Yankee seasons was rewarded with championship seasons three of communications coursework aqa, his final four years (World Series championships in 1977-78 and an A.L. championship in ’76). White played well in the post-season, particularly the methods 1978 World Series, when he hit .333 (8-for-24) with nine runs scored, a homer, four RBI and two stolen bases. If Bucky Dent hadn’t been so hot, White might have been the robert collected Series MVP.

White was good, but not great, with the bat and the glove and on the basepaths. I gave Keller the research a critical approach edge because he had more great seasons, but White had more good seasons. He never hit .300 for a full season, but four times hit in the .290s and had a .271 career average. He never hit more than 22 homers, but hit 10 or more in eight seasons and de ne 3 had 160 for methods thinking, his career. He was in double figures in thesis scientific revolution, stolen bases every full season he played, with a peak of 31 in 1976 and 233 for his career. He never reached 100 RBI in research a critical approach 2011, a season, but had nine seasons of dissertation, 50 or more, peaking at 94 in 1970 (one of his two All-Star seasons). He led the and statistics a critical thinking approach league with 104 runs scored in essay, 1976 (one of two 100-run seasons) and in research and statistics a critical approach 2011, walks with 99 in 1972. Never spectacular, but solid for more than a decade. As noted above, I generally favor peak performance over longevity, and Hideki Matsui was a better hitter than White, with four 100-RBI seasons and a high of 31 homers, three 100-run seasons and two .300 seasons. But White’s huge advantage on the basepaths and in symbolism, longevity gave him the edge for No.

2. Matsui was a Yankee just seven years, to research methods and statistics a critical 15 for White, and started in left field only sample methodology, four of research methods, those years. If his 2009 World Series MVP performance had come as the left fielder instead of the the chrysanthemums essay symbolism DH, I might have pushed Matsui up a notch, but he’ll have to methods a critical settle for de ne, third place. Johnny Damon played left field, even in the three games in Philadelphia (Matsui pinch-hit in all three games). Bob Meusel played left field more than any other position, 626 games for the Yankees. But he alternated between left and right, and never actually played 100 games in left in any single season. But he was a heck of a hitter, playing lots and methods 2011 regularly in left. In 1925, when he played 88 games in left, 44 in essay describing, right and 27 at third base, Meusel led the American League with 33 homers and methods a critical thinking 2011 134 RBI (one of five 100-RBI seasons). His batting average in scientific, 10 Yankee seasons was .311, and left field was his primary position seven of those seasons. As you’ll see shortly, greater Yankees played in left field, but they didn’t play there as long or as well as Meusel, even though he wasn’t anchored in left. Other Hall of Fame Yankee left fielders. In addition to The Babe, at least seven Hall of Famers played left field for the Yankees, but all are known better for playing at research a critical 2011, other positions and/or for other teams:

Dave Winfield played in left his first three seasons as a Yankee, 1981-3. He was No. 5 on this list until I learned how much Babe played in left. Winfield was an All-Star all three left-field seasons and sample methodology topped 100 RBI in both full seasons (’81 was shortened by research a critical approach a strike). He also won two Gold Gloves. I could have moved Winfield ahead of Meusel based on playing much more in left all three seasons than Meusel played in any season. Essay? But Meusel played almost 300 more games in left and played better in the post-season. And Winfield’s best Yankee years came in methods approach 2011, right field.

I presumed Rickey Henderson would be in the top five and communications coursework maybe even top the methods and statistics a critical 2011 list. But I was surprised to sample dissertation see that he played only one full season in left for the Yankees. I was remembering incorrectly that his center field hitch was pretty short. But it was the full 1985 and ’86 seasons. And ’85 was easily Henderson’s best season as a Yankee. Joe DiMaggio played more games in left field (64) than center (55) his rookie year, before becoming the research methods thinking approach 2011 Yankees’ regular center fielder. Mickey Mantle played left field mostly in 1965. Earle Combs, another center fielder, played 215 games in left. Yogi Berra played 148 games in left, 81 of them in 1961, when it was his primary position.

Enos Slaughter earned his Hall of Fame perch in his years with the St. Louis Cardinals (playing mostly right field). But late in his career, he played 100 games in left for essay describing, the Yankees, spread across four seasons playing part-time. By the methods a critical thinking way, I checked and thesis revolution Hall of methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011, Famer Reggie Jackson and should-be Hall of Famer Roger Maris played left field for culture coursework, the A’s but never for the Yankees. I’m going to guess that Willie Keeler appeared in left field sometime, though Baseball-Reference.com doesn’t break down his outfield appearances by position. The Hall of research thinking 2011, Fame lists right field as his primary position. Culture Aqa? The Yankees were the Highlanders then, and I’m focusing on actual Yankees here. Two Yankees who belong in the Hall of Fame also played left field: Elston Howard, who had a better career than the white catchers chosen by the Hall of Fame Veterans Committee, played 227 games in left field, his primary position in research and statistics approach 2011, 1956 and ’57, when Berra was still the primary starter at catcher. Essay Describing My Personality? I’d be surprised if he ever makes the methods thinking 2011 Hall of essaye de ne pas rire, Fame.

Tim Raines, who has his last shot next year on the writers’ ballot for the Hall of Fame, played about 50 games a year in left field for the 1997-99 Yankees. His Cooperstown credentials are based mostly on research methods and statistics approach, his years with the Expos and White Sox, but he won his championships with the Yankees. Also playing left field (almost 50 games) for sample methodology, the 1990s Yankees was Darryl Strawberry, a former National League home run leader who appeared headed for research methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011, Cooperstown before cocaine addiction sidetracked his career. I was thinking Johnny Damon might have a shot at the fifth spot on the list, but he played mostly center for the Yankees. Sample? His only research methods and statistics a critical approach, full-time season in the chrysanthemums essay, left for the Yankees was 2009, a good season, but not good enough to move him onto the list. Methods And Statistics 2011? I think Damon’s shot at creeley, Cooperstown rested on reaching 3,000 hits, but he retired at 2,769.

Brett Gardner could push his way onto this list in a few years. He’s been the Yankees’ primary left fielder for four seasons (plus 2013 in a critical thinking 2011, center) and his hitting is improving. He led the league with 49 steals in 2011, but he isn’t the hitter Meusel was. I thought Lou Piniella might make the fifth spot on this list (he’s fifth on both of the lists linked at the end of the chrysanthemums symbolism, this post). Research And Statistics Thinking 2011? But as I did my research, I found that he never started 100 games in left field in a season. Gene Woodling’s autograph on a ball belonging to describing my son Tom. Gene Woodling started 100 or more games in left field four straight championship years for the Yankees (1950-53), but he never played more than 125 games for the Yankees, never hit 20 homers or drove in 70 runs. He hit .300 a couple times and led the league with a .429 on-base percentage in 1953. On longevity, he deserves consideration for the fifth spot, but he was never a full-time player.

He was one of Casey Stengel’s platoon players. David Justice played only 59 games in left for the Yankees. Chad Curtis hit two homers in the 1998 World Series, but didn’t play left field long enough or well enough (except in that World Series) to push his way onto the list, even with my bias in favor of post-season play. Chuck Knoblauch moved to and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 left field after his defensive troubles at second base started. Even Jose Canseco played four games in left for the Yankees. And a lot of robert collected essays, Yankee left fielders played way more than that, but I’m not going to list them all here. As I noted at the top, the Red Sox had three straight Hall of Fame left fielders covering most of four-plus decades, except the breaks for Williams’ military service. Throw in and statistics 2011, Manny Ramirez and Mike Greenwell, and the Red Sox clearly have the best tradition in left field.

The St. Communications? Louis Cardinals (Joe Medwick, Stan Musial for 929 games, Lou Brock), Pittsburgh Pirates (Fred Clarke, Ralph Kiner, Willie Stargell) and Washington Senators/Minnesota Twins (Goose Goslin, Heinie Manush and 471 games of Harmon Killebrew) also had three Hall of Fame left fielders. The A’s have two (Henderson and Al Simmons). The Yankees’ left-field tradition might rank somewhere between fifth and seventh, if not lower. I explained my criteria in research a critical thinking approach, the post on first basemen, so if this seems familiar, it’s because I cut and pasted that explanation here, then adapted it for left fielders. If a player is in the Hall of Fame (Ruth) or belongs there (Howard and Raines), that carries considerable weight with me. If Howard had played left primarily or Raines had played for the Yankees in his prime, they would have made the list, probably second place. I value both peak performance and longevity, but peak performance more. That’s why Ruth and Keller, who didn’t play as long in left as White, ranked ahead of him. Measures of peak performance, such as MVP awards and leading leagues in important stats, will move a person up my list.

All the other left fielders together didn’t lead the league in important stats as Yankees as many times as Ruth did. Few ballplayers actually matter in the broader culture beyond baseball, but Ruth did and that counted for the chrysanthemums essay, him, too. I rank players primarily on their time with the team, so Keller and White stand out not just for their strong careers, but because all their time was spent with the Yankees. Time at the position is research approach 2011 important, too. Winfield missed the list because he played only three seasons in left field.

Look for him on my right field list. Post-season play and championship contributions matter a lot to me. Winfield made one post-season for culture, the Yankees and hit 1-for-22 in the 1981 World Series. George Steinbrenner’s “Mr. Research Thinking 2011? May” shot was cruel and unwarranted, but all the people on the list played well in symbolism, the post-season and contributed to Yankee championships. This factor didn’t play into any of these decisions, but if two players were dead even at a position for the Yankees, I would have moved the one with the research thinking approach 2011 better overall career ahead. Collected Essays? For instance, if Winfield or Henderson had been tied with someone, their years with the Padres, Blue Jays, A’s, etc. Research Methods And Statistics Thinking Approach 2011? would have pushed them ahead. Special moments matter, too.

Ruth had a few of those. Other rankings of Yankee left fielders. Unless noted otherwise, statistics cited here come from Baseball-Reference.com. The 5 best third basemen in Yankee history. When I ranked the Yankees’ best 50 starting pitchers, I decided that use of sample dissertation methodology, performance-enhancing drugs wouldn’t be a major factor. I would rank players based on their performance as Yankees, and and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 if two players were even in that ranking, the player who wasn’t tainted by drug use would get the nod. But I wouldn’t totally discount a player based on culture coursework, PED use. So Roger Clemens ranked 16th among Yankee starters.

I’m taking the same approach with position players. I love Graig Nettles and I don’t like Alex Rodriguez. But I’m ranking them by performance as Yankees. Each has played 11 years for the Yankees (Nettles played more games at third base, but A-Rod has played over 1,000 games there). Rodriguez has better Yankee stats in virtually every offensive category. He won two MVP awards as a Yankee, both at third, and Nettles’ best showing in MVP voting was fifth place in 1977. A-Rod’s a seven-time All-Star as a Yankee, Nettles five.

As a Yankee, A-Rod led the league in homers twice, RBI once, runs scored twice, slugging three times and OPS once. Nettles led the league in homers once. A-Rod’s post-season hitting has been awful most of the methods thinking time, but Nettles wasn’t a great post-season hitter most of the time either. The Chrysanthemums Essay? Nettles was a better fielder, but A-Rod has to rank first here. Of course Nettles ranks second. I’ve noted before that he belongs in the Hall of Fame. Research And Statistics A Critical Approach 2011? He would have a few more than his two Gold Gloves if he hadn’t had the misfortune to start playing when Brooks Robinson won that award every single year. Nettles’ Game Three defensive performance in the 1978 World Series was as good a post-season game as any fielder ever had.

Despite overall weak hitting in the post-season, Nettles sizzled in the 1981 American League Championship Series, going 6-for-12 with 9 RBI in just three games and being named MVP. He was a defensive, offensive and scientific revolution leadership anchor for the Yankees’ 1976-81 run that included two world championships, two more A.L. championships and a fifth division title. He’s an easy choice for No. 2 here. And, if I were going to discount A-Rod’s achievements because he’s a drug cheat, I’d need to discount Nettles for loading his bat with Super Balls. Red Rolfe baseball card image from Wikimedia. Red Rolfe was an All-Star four of his 10 seasons (all with the Yankees), winning five World Series. He led the research and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 league with 213 hits, 139 runs and 46 doubles in 1939, his best season and the Yankees’ fourth straight as champions.

He topped .300 four seasons as a Yankee and hit a solid .284 in six World Series, emerging as champions in five of them. The Yankees have done alright with Ivy League players. Lou Gehrig went to Columbia, Rolfe to Dartmouth. Rolfe also coached at Dartmouth and in the professional Basketball Association of America. He managed the Tigers for parts of merton thesis scientific revolution, three seasons (including a second-place finish behind the Yankees in 1950) and part of a fourth. Wade Boggs played his best years in Boston, but was an All-Star and .300 hitter the first four of his five seasons as a Yankee.

The last of those four All-Star seasons, 1996, Boggs won his only world championship, celebrating on horseback. Scott Brosius gets the research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach fifth spot on this list, based on robert, four seasons that all ended in the World Series, three of them with victories and research methods a critical approach one with a Game-Seven, ninth-inning loss. He won an All-Star selection and a Gold Glove for the Yankees, and in the post-season he hit eight homers and drove in 30 runs. His two homers in the chrysanthemums symbolism, Game Three of the research methods 2011 1998 World Series, including a three-run eighth-inning blast with the Yankees trailing 3-2, helped him win the World Series MVP. Gil McGougald’s autograph (along with Hank Bauer’s, Ed Lopat and Eddie Madjeski. As I mentioned in my post on second basemen, Gil McDougald would rank ahead of some of these players on a list of essay describing, all-time best Yankees. But he kept switching positions. He was Rookie of the Year (in 1951) and an All-Star (in 1952) playing primarily at third. But he played more games at second (599) than at and statistics approach 2011, third (508).

That’s almost as many games as Brosius played at thesis scientific, third for the Yankees, but Brosius was better in the World Series, hitting .314 to just .237 for McDougald. Joe Sewell is actually in and statistics, the Hall of Fame, but that’s primarily for his decade at shortstop for the Indians, not for his final three years, playing third base for the Yankees, 1931-33. The Chrysanthemums Essay Symbolism? The same is true of methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011, Wade Boggs (except that he stayed at third base), but he played longer for the chrysanthemums symbolism, the Yankees and was stronger at that stage of his career than Sewell. Hall of Famer Frank “Home Run” Baker finished his career for the Yankees, after earning his Dead-Ball-Era nickname for the Philadelphia A’s, leading the league four straight years in homers, without ever hitting more than a dozen. He started only four years for the Yankees and, in research and statistics thinking, an age of creeley, inflated batting stats, topped .300 only once for the Yankees. And he never led the league in methods a critical 2011, any batting category for the Yankees. Robin Ventura played only one full season, 2002, with the Yankees, but he was an All-Star, hitting 27 homers and driving in 93 runs. I really liked Clete Boyer when I was young, and he’d have won some Gold Gloves except that he played third base in the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, the American League in the era of Brooks Robinson (he did win one after being traded to the Braves). He played longer for the Yankees (eight years, seven as a starter) than Brosius or Boggs, but they were better hitters by far. Joe Dugan hit better than Boyer in research methods a critical thinking approach 2011, his seven years with the creeley collected essays 1920s Yankees, but I still rank Boggs and Brosius higher.

It does seem odd not to research methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 have any Yankees from the 1920s, ’50s or ’60s on this list, but I think I have the sample dissertation methodology right top 5. Aaron Boone had a better special moment than any Yankee third baseman, but didn’t even play a full season for the Yankees. And even in the post-season, he hit just .170. Research Methods A Critical Thinking Approach? But one of creeley, those hits will live forever in Yankee fans’ memories. Which team has been best at methods and statistics thinking approach, third? We don’t have a clear winner for de ne 3, the team with the research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach best tradition at third base. The Red Sox (Boggs and Jimmy Collins) and Orioles (Robinson and de ne 3 Cal Ripken Jr., who played 675 games at third) are the research a critical only teams that were the pas rire 3 primary teams for two Hall of Fame third basemen. The Pirates have Hall of methods and statistics a critical thinking approach, Famer Pie Traynor and Bill Madlock, a four-time batting champ. Describing? The Cubs had Hall of Famer Ron Santo and Madlock.

The Braves had Hall of Famer Eddie Mathews, certain Hall of Famer Chipper Jones and research methods and statistics approach MVPs Bob Elliott and Terry Pendleton. Without researching the other third basemen on any of these teams, I’d guess the Braves probably have the strongest tradition. But the Yankees are a contender and probably no worse than third or fourth. I explained my criteria in the post on first basemen, so if this seems familiar, it’s because I cut and pasted that explanation here, then adapted it for third basemen. If a player is in the Hall of pas rire, Fame (Boggs), belongs there (Nettles) or would be a Hall of Famer if not for scandal (A-Rod), that carries considerable weight with me. Boggs, Sewell and Baker joined the research and statistics a critical approach 2011 Yankees late in their Hall of Fame careers, but only Boggs was still playing at a Hall of sample, Fame level (if in research methods and statistics thinking 2011, a bit of decline). Sample? Sewell and Baker weren’t nearly as good in their Yankee years. If two players were dead even at and statistics a critical thinking, a position for sample, the Yankees, I would have moved the one with the and statistics approach 2011 better overall career ahead. Essaye De Ne? I think Boggs was a bit ahead of Brosius as a Yankee, but his total career made that decision easier.

I value both peak performance and research and statistics a critical approach longevity, but peak performance more. The Chrysanthemums? A-Rod’s MVP’s and a critical thinking league crowns helped secure the creeley essays top spot on the list. I rank players primarily on their time with the research methods and statistics a critical team, but Rolfe is the only career Yankee on dissertation, this list. Except if I needed a tie-breaker, I don’t count Boggs’ years with the Red Sox, Nettles’ with the Indians and Padres or A-Rod’s with the methods a critical thinking approach Mariners and dissertation Rangers. Post-season play and championship contributions matter a lot to me. All the contenders for the fifth spot contributed to multiple champions, but Brosius played the best in the World Series.

A-Rod’s poor post-season play might have dropped him to second place if Nettles had been closer in regular-season offensive performance. Special moments matter, too. Research Approach? Nettles’ stellar defensive plays in the ’78 World Series and Brosius’ memorable 1998 homer helped seal their rankings. If Boone had played a few good years for essaye 3, the Yankees, his special moment would have pushed him onto the list. Other rankings of top Yankee third basemen. Unless noted otherwise, statistics cited here come from Baseball-Reference.com. The 5 best shortstops in Yankee history. My Derek Jeter rookie card.

This call couldn’t be easier. What more can I say? He’ll be a first-ballot Hall of Famer, close to a unanimous choice despite the strong anti-Yankee bias of voters. If Ozzie Smith, Cal Ripken Jr., Honus Wagner and Ernie Banks had been Yankees, this would at least be a contest. And Jeter would still win.

Phil Rizzuto’s autograph on research thinking 2011, a ball belonging to my son Mike. Phil Rizzuto is a pretty easy choice for essay symbolism, this spot, too. Until Jeter is eligible, the Scooter is the and statistics a critical only Yankee shortstop in de ne, the Hall of Fame. He played all 13 years of his career for the Yankees (with a three-year break for military service during World War II). He played all but two of his 1,649 career games at shortstop. A Critical Approach? He was the describing MVP in and statistics a critical thinking approach, 1950.

He was a five-time All-Star. He contributed to seven Yankee World Series championships and is sixth all-time in culture aqa, World Series games played, eighth in hits with 45, fourth in walks with 30 and and statistics a critical 2011 tied for third in stolen bases with 10. Rizzuto was the best American League shortstop of his time. My Bucky Dent bobblehead. In my ranking criteria, I note that special moments are important to me. And few moments stand out essay my personality more in Yankee history than Bucky Dent‘s home run to take the lead on Boston in thinking 2011, the 1978 one-game playoff.

He continued his hot hitting in the World Series, going 10-for-25 with 7 RBI and revolution winning the Series MVP award. Dent was an All-Star two of research methods and statistics 2011, his six Yankee years. Based on regular-season performance, he wouldn’t rank this high and might not even make the top five. But Yankee shortstops are pretty tightly bunched behind Jeter and collected Rizzuto, and Dent’s October performance in 1978 pushes him ahead of the pack. I have to give my wife, Mimi, some credit here: Earlier in the 1978 season, on July 3, Dent was coming to the plate in research methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011, a game against the Red Sox. She liked his name and predicted he’d hit a homer. I condescendingly informed her that he was a singles hitter (he hit just 40 homers in his career and just five that season). But two of the symbolism homers were against the Red Sox: the research methods a critical thinking 2011 one Mimi called in July and the one that propelled the essaye Yankees into the post-season in October.

I generally don’t like sideline interviews before and during games. Research And Statistics Approach? They are far more filled with cliches than insight or humor. But my favorite such moment was when Steve Lyons interviewed Dent during a Yankees-Red Sox playoff game (in 2003, I’m guessing). Lyons told Dent that he thought Red Sox fans might not know his real middle name, so Lyons asked what it was. Dent deadpanned “Earl.” I don’t hold his awful 1989-90 managing tenure against him, but don’t look for him in my ranking of best Yankee managers. Tony Kubek had a better post-playing career as a broadcaster than Dent had as a manager.

But this is a ranking of the chrysanthemums symbolism, shortstops, and I give Dent the nod based on his October 1978 play. Methods And Statistics A Critical Thinking Approach 2011? But you could easily rank Kubek third. He played nine years for the Yankees, compared to essaye de ne pas rire just six for research and statistics thinking approach 2011, Dent. Communications Culture? But Dent played exclusively at short, 694 games. Kubek played more games at shortstop for the Yankees (882), but also played 145 games in the outfield and and statistics a critical thinking 55 at third base. Kubek was a better hitter for the Yankees (.266 to .237) with more power (he hit 14 homers in 1960, and Dent never reached double figures in a season). Kubek was a three-time world champion and three-time All-Star, one more than Dent on each count. But Kubek hit .240 in 37 World Series games. Dent hit .349 in revolution, 12.

Kubek’s career advantages in the regular season are not enough, in my view, to and statistics thinking 2011 offset Dent’s spectacular play when it mattered most. Kubek’s most memorable post-season moment was the bad-hop groundball that hit him in the throat in Game Seven of the dissertation 1960 World Series. It was a potential double play, but instead it left two runners on base with no outs in the bottom of the eighth inning. The Pirates went on research methods a critical thinking, to score five runs that inning, taking a 9-7 lead and setting the stage for revolution, Bill Mazeroski’s Series-winning homer after the Yankees tied the game in the top of the ninth. Research A Critical 2011? The bad hop wasn’t Kubek’s fault, but Dent’s big moments in the Red Sox playoff game and against the Dodgers in the World Series place him ahead of merton revolution, Kubek. Frank Crosetti’s autograph (just above a Whitey Ford autograph) on methods and statistics, a ball belonging to my son Tom. You could also rank Frankie Crosetti third or fourth. With 17 seasons as a Yankee, eight of them as the dissertation methodology starting shortstop, and and statistics approach many more years coaching, Crosetti’s Yankee tenure seemed endless. His playing career spanned from the late years of thesis, Babe Ruth’s career to the early years of Yogi Berra’s.

Crosetti was a two-time All-Star, but was relegated to a backup role in 1941, Rizzuto’s rookie season. Research A Critical 2011? He led the league seven times in getting hit by pitches and in essay describing, 1938 led the A.L. Thinking? with 27 stolen bases. But Crosetti was a weak hitter, .245 for his career and methodology twice leading the research a critical thinking approach league in strikeouts. Though the Yankees won six of the seven World Series he played in, Crosetti hit only .174. I feel comfortable ranking Dent and Kubek ahead of Crosetti, because they were better, but he played almost as many games at essaye de ne pas rire, shortstop for research and statistics thinking approach, the Yankees as the two of them combined. So he gets the fifth spot on the list. The Yankees didn’t have a lot of communications aqa, great shortstops. And Statistics? Mark Koenig started four years, including for the great 1927 Murderer’s Row Yankees and hit .319 one year. Everett Scott was even more unremarkable as a three-year starter earlier in culture aqa, the ’20s. Research Methods And Statistics? Leo Durocher, better known as a manager (but not for revolution, the Yankees), played two seasons at shortstop for New York. You’d have to be a hard-core Yankee fan to remember the research methods a critical thinking approach nine starting shortstops who filled the gap between Dent and Jeter.

I couldn’t until I looked them up. Joe Sewell, a Hall of Fame shortstop, finished his career with Yankees (1931-33), but he had moved to third base by then. Update: Stuart Warner pointed out on Facebook that I omitted Tom Tresh. Creeley Essays? I liked Tresh as a young Yankee fan, but correctly remembered that he played more outfield than shortstop (only 351 games, including 1962, when he was an All-Star and Rookie of the Year. He doesn’t belong on the top-five list, but definitely among “the rest.” There’s not a clear team with the strongest shortstop tradition, but the Yankees are in contention. The Pirates (with Honus Wagner, Arky Vaughan and Rabbit Maranville) and Orioles (Cal Ripken Jr., Luis Aparicio and Bobby Wallace when they were the St. Louis Browns) each have more Hall of Famers at shortstop than the Yankees, even if you count Jeter before his election makes it official. The Giants had 19th-Century shortstops George Davis and John Ward, plus Travis Jackson, one of the most outrageous examples of how easy Hall of Fame selection has been for players from the 1920s). The White Sox (Aparicio and Luke Appling), Cubs (Joe Tinker and Ernie Banks) and Indians (Lou Boudreau and Sewell) each match the Yankees with two Hall of Fame shortstops (counting Jeter). I’m not going to study the research methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011 other teams’ shortstops who didn’t make it to Cooperstown, but I’d guess the Pirates (who also had 1960 MVP Dick Groat) might have the best tradition, with the Yankees ranking about fifth.

I explained my criteria in the post on first basemen, so if this seems familiar, it’s because I cut and pasted that explanation here, then adapted it for shortstops. If a player is in the Hall of Fame (Rizzuto) or bound to get there (Jeter), that carries considerable weight with me. I rank players primarily on their time with the team, so Jeter, Rizzuto, Kubek and essay Crosetti stand out not just for their great careers, but because all their time was spent with the Yankees. Aparicio made it to Cooperstown and had Hall of Fame seasons for both the Orioles and White Sox, so he counts heavily for both teams, but not as heavily as Jeter or Ripken, who spent their full careers with one team. And Aparicio wouldn’t count much for the Red Sox, because his career was in decline when he reached Boston at age 37. I value both peak performance and longevity, but peak performance more. That’s why Kubek finished ahead of Crosetti.

Measures of methods and statistics, peak performance, such as MVP awards and leading leagues in important stats, will move a person up my list. Rizzuto is the Yankees’ only shortstop MVP, but Jeter was too far ahead of him in other respects for that to matter and led the American League twice in hits and once in runs. Few ballplayers actually matter in the broader culture beyond baseball, but Jeter did (maybe Dent, too) and that counted for them. Time at the position is essay symbolism important, too. Research And Statistics A Critical Approach? Banks had his best years at shortstop, so he counts heavily for the Cubs there, but he actually played more games at first base, so you can’t count his full career. Post-season play and championship contributions matter a lot to sample me. I should add that I don’t consider those to be the same thing. Kubek and Crosetti contributed to more championships than Dent, but Dent played better in the post-season. This factor didn’t play into and statistics a critical thinking any of these decisions, but if two players were dead even at a position for the Yankees, I would have moved the one with the better overall career ahead. Essay? For instance, if Dent and Kubek had been equal as Yankees, Dent’s four years with the White Sox, including one year as and All-Star and finishing second for and statistics approach, Rookie of the Year another, would have broken the tie.

Special moments matter, too. Dent’s special moment, combined with the excellent World Series that followed, was a difference-maker here, separating him from both Kubek and Crosetti. I wish the Polldaddy version with WordPress let you rank, rather than just voting for the best. Merton Thesis Scientific? I think I know how this will come out if people vote seriously: Other rankings of Yankee shortstops.

Unless noted otherwise, statistics cited here come from Baseball-Reference.com. The 5 best second basemen in Yankee history. I tried to talk myself out of research methods 2011, Tony Lazzeri at second base, because I kept wanting someone to be better. He’s not even a top 10 all-time second baseman. But he’s a Hall of Famer (albeit from the ’20s and ’30s when that was easier than any time since).

And he played second base 12 years for the Yankees. Willie Randolph played 13 and I loved Randolph, but Lazzeri had more hits, homers and RBI as a Yankee, and a higher batting average. Lazzeri topped 100 RBI seven times and scored more than 100 runs twice (Randolph never topped 100 in either category). Lazzeri topped .300 in batting five times, including a .354 performance in 1929. He was a bona fide member of the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, Murderer’s Row and clearly the best Yankee second baseman ever, somewhat to research and statistics a critical my surprise. He anchored the Yankee infield for five world-champion teams, bridging the Ruth and DiMaggio years. This is an easier call than I anticipated.

I also expected Robinson Cano to rank lower on this list. I was surprised to see he had played nine years as a Yankee, but not surprised to see that he topped 100 RBI three times, scored 100 runs four times and hit over 200 Yankee homers. Thesis? I don’t know if he’s going to make the Hall of Fame, or if he should, but he got his career off to thinking 2011 a Hall of Fame start playing in New York. He also earned two Gold Gloves with spectacular, if not always consistent, defense. Essay Describing My Personality? I tried to push the other guys on this list above Cano because he kind of disappointed me with his post-season play (he was awful in the 2009 World Series and hit only .222 in 51 post-season games). Approach 2011? But his regular-season play pushed him up here and communications culture coursework aqa even gained him consideration for No. 1.

I moved Randolph into third place because he played the position strongly on research and statistics approach, offense and defense for the Yankees for 13 years. He was great at merton thesis, drawing walks (1,005 for the Yankees, including a league-leading 119 in 1980). I think Randolph illustrates that I don’t argue for Hall of research a critical thinking 2011, Fame election for every good Yankee player. Yes, he was better than some 1920s infielders in the Hall of Fame, but they don’t belong there and neither does he. Lou Whitaker and Frank White were better contemporary second basemen in the American League. Dissertation? But Randolph was a cornerstone of the Yankee champions of 1976-81, when they won two World Series, two more A.L. championships and research and statistics a critical thinking approach a fifth division title. He was a six-time All-Star and sample dissertation methodology absolutely belongs on this list. Joe Gordon had to wait a while to get into the Hall of Fame not just because of 2011, anti-Yankee bias and merton scientific revolution the voters’ bias in methods thinking approach, favor of longevity. He also had to creeley wait because he was the odd beneficiary in 1942 of the writers’ bias against Ted Williams. Gordon had an outstanding year: hitting .322 with 18 homers, 103 RBI and great defense for the pennant-winning Yankees. But Williams won the Triple Crown that year: .356, 36, 137.

Williams also led the research and statistics a critical 2011 league in runs (141), walks (145), total bases (388), on-base percentage (.499!), slugging (.648) and OPS (1.147). You know what Gordon led the league in? Strikeouts (95) and grounding into double plays (22). It was probably the most ridiculous MVP vote in history when the Baseball Writers’ Association of America voted Gordon the MVP over pas rire, Williams. But that wasn’t Gordon’s fault. He didn’t have Hall of Fame career numbers, but he sacrificed two prime years to serve in the military during World War II. And he was an All-Star five straight years before going into the military and four straight years after coming back. How many players who were All-Stars nine straight seasons aren’t in methods a critical 2011, the Hall of Fame? And it probably would have been 11 if the war hadn’t interrupted his career. Gordon would rank ahead of culture coursework, Randolph based on his full career, but he played only seven years for the Yankees (he was traded to the Indians after the 1946 season for Allie Reynolds, who should join him in the Hall of Fame).

Gordon hit well in only two of research methods and statistics a critical thinking, his six World Series, but he helped the Yankees to the chrysanthemums four world championships and the Indians to their last title, in 1948. In another interesting swap, Gordon went from the Indians to the Tigers in 1960 for Jimmy Dykes in a rare trade of managers. My autographed photo of Bobby Richardson. Bobby Richardson may have the methods thinking 2011 biggest disparity between regular-season hitting and World Series hitting of anyone who played substantial World Series time. He was a good player, making seven All-Star teams, leading the creeley collected essays league with 209 hits in 1962 and finishing second to Mickey Mantle in the MVP vote that year. But he was only a .266 career hitter, with 34 homers and 390 RBI in 12 seasons, all with the Yankees.

In October, though, Richardson was something special. He set hitting records that still stand in three different World Series: In 1960, he drove in a record 12 runs, also scoring eight and hitting two triples and a grand slam (tying a record he still shares; no one has hit a second World Series grand slam). Methods And Statistics Thinking Approach? His 11 hits were one short of the record. He was the only World Series MVP ever from a losing team. In 1961, his nine hits tied a record for a five-game series that he still shares. In 1964, he set a record that he still shares with 13 hits in a World Series.

He hit only 4-for-27 in the 1962 World Series, but that Series is still best remembered for his spectacular Game Seven catch of methodology, a Willie McCovey line drive, with Matty Alou on research a critical, third with the tying run and sample methodology Willie Mays on second with the research and statistics a critical thinking winner. While his stellar hitting in essay symbolism, other Series was far better than his regular-season hitting, the research and statistics thinking defense was no surprise: 1962 was the second of five straight Gold Glove seasons for Richardson. Who else in World Series history set offensive records in three series and made a Series-saving defensive play in a fourth, all in a five-year stretch? If you were compiling an aqa all-time World Series team, Richardson has to be your second baseman. I’ll disclose a bias here: Richardson was my childhood baseball hero, even above Mickey Mantle. I met him in the 1970s, when he came to methods a critical thinking approach a baseball event in Stanton, Iowa, and essaye pas rire I was an research methods a critical thinking approach editor in revolution, nearby Shenandoah.

That’s where I got the autographed photo. Billy Martin’s autograph on a ball belonging to my son Mike. I tried to get Billy Martin onto this list, but he played only seven years (three playing 100 or more games) for the Yankees. His only All-Star season was 1956. He hit .333 in World Series play, had a spectacular game-saving catch of his own and still shares the record for 12 hits in a six-game World Series (1953). Alfonso Soriano was spectacular in three years at second for and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011, the Yankees, leading the essaye league in research methods and statistics thinking, 2002 with 209 hits, 128 runs and 41 stolen bases (not to mention 39 homers and 102 RBI). But he played second base for coursework, the Yankees for research a critical thinking approach 2011, just two years. And he was mostly horrible in the post-season, striking out 11 times against the Red Sox and the chrysanthemums essay nine times against research and statistics a critical the Marlins in the chrysanthemums symbolism, the 2003 post-season. He didn’t play long enough at second for research a critical thinking 2011, the Yankees or well enough in October to push Richardson off this list. Chuck Knoblauch had a career to compare with some of the players on this list, if you count his Twin years, and he hit well for the Yankees and contributed to three World Series titles (plus a fourth with the Twins).

But you just can’t overlook the throwing problems (26 errors in creeley collected, 1999 and 15 in thinking 2011, part-time play in 2000) that forced the Yankees to move him to left field. Speaking of throwing problems, Steve Sax had two All-Star years at describing, second base for bad Yankees teams. Sax’s throwing problems were years earlier with the Dodgers. He played well at second for research methods thinking approach, the Yankees, but not long enough to essay rank in research methods and statistics thinking 2011, the top five. Gil McGougald’s autograph (along with Hank Bauer’s, Ed Lopat and Eddie Madjeski. Gil McDougald might lead a list (if I ever make one) of Yankee utility players. He played his full 10-year career for the Yankees, making five All-Star teams. But he can’t rank very high at any position, having played 599 games at coursework, second, 508 at third and 284 at shortstop. He had only five seasons with 100 or more games at research methods a critical thinking approach 2011, any one position, two at my personality, third base, two at second and research a critical thinking one at shortstop. If you were ranking all-time Yankees at all positions, he might pass up some people on this list, but not just ranking second basemen. Jerry Coleman was an All-Star in 1950, but played only 572 games at second base.

He topped 100 games in only four of his nine seasons, all with the Yankees. He’d rank below McDougald both as a second baseman and a utility fielder. With bigger stars all off to war in 1944-45, Snuffy Stirnweiss led the American League twice each in hits, runs and culture coursework stolen bases and in 1945 added titles in methods and statistics, batting, slugging and OPS. But he wasn’t as good with the major leagues at full strength. His only All-Star year, 1946, he played more at third base than second. He was a significant contributor to the 1947 champions, but became a part-time player after that. Luis Sojo deserves special mention.

In parts of seven seasons with the scientific Yankees, he did not play 100 games in a season even once, so he was never more than a part-time player. But Yankee fans will always appreciate his clutch 2000 post-season (9 RBI in research methods and statistics a critical, 14 games). Similarly, Brian Doyle never played even 40 games in a season for the Yankees. But when Randolph was injured for sample methodology, the 1978 post-season, Doyle hit .391. Research Methods And Statistics A Critical 2011? He was 7-of-16 with 3 RBI and 4 runs in the World Series, a pretty good place to play the best baseball of methodology, your career. I also must mention Horace Clarke, who followed Richardson at second base. He anchored the position from 1967 to methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 1973, horrible years for the Yankees. He was a good fielder but a bad hitter.

I call the drought between the 1964 and 1976 World Series teams the “Horace Clarke years,” which probably isn’t fair to him. Describing My Personality? But the Yankees weren’t very good then, and neither was he. Other teams’ second base traditions. The Yankees are not a contender for the best tradition at second base. The Cardinals (Rogers Hornsby, Frankie Frisch, Red Schoendienst) and research methods a critical thinking approach Cubs (Johnny Evers, Billy Herman, Ryne Sandberg) both were the primary teams of the chrysanthemums symbolism, three Hall of methods and statistics thinking approach, Fame second basemen, including someone who’d make most top-10 lists (Hornsby, Frisch, Sandberg). And the Cubs got Hornsby for an MVP season and three more years. The White Sox (Eddie Collins and de ne pas rire Nellie Fox), Indians (Nap Lajoie and Gordon), Reds (Joe Morgan and Bid McPhee), A’s (Collins and Lajoie) and Giants (Frisch and a year of Hornsby) each matched the Yankees with two Hall of Fame second basemen. I haven’t researched this deeply enough to be confident with rankings (that might be a future post), but I see the methods a critical thinking approach Cubs at No.

1 here and the Yankees about fifth. I explained my criteria in the post on first basemen, so if this seems familiar, it’s because I cut and pasted that explanation here, then adapted it for second basemen. If a player is in the Hall of Fame (Lazzeri), that carries considerable weight with me. I value both peak performance and longevity, but peak performance more. Cano didn’t play at second for the Yankees as long as Randolph, but Cano’s peaks were higher. I rank players primarily on sample, their time with the team, so Lazzeri and Richardson stand out not just for their great careers, but because all their time was spent with the Yankees.

Frisch made it to Cooperstown and had Hall of Fame seasons for thinking approach 2011, both the Giants and thesis scientific Cardinals, so he counts heavily for research and statistics a critical, both teams, but not as heavily as Sandberg does for the Cubs, because he played most of his career and culture coursework all of his great seasons in Chicago. Time at the position is important, too. A Critical Thinking? If Soriano had stayed with the Yankees and moved to left field (as he did when he moved to the Nationals in 2006, two years after the coursework Yankees traded him to research and statistics a critical approach the Rangers), his performance in essaye de ne pas rire, left field would only be a tie-breaker, not a big factor. Post-season play and research methods approach 2011 championship contributions matter a lot to me. I should add that I don’t consider those to be the same thing. Lazzeri contributed to five Yankee world championships, to three for Richardson, so that’s an advantage for Lazzeri. However, Richardson played better in the post-season (Lazzeri was good, but you don’t find him among all-time leaders, let alone record-holders, in World Series batting). If two players were dead even at a position for the Yankees, I moved the one with the better overall career ahead. For instance, Gordon’s play for the Indians (and his Hall of Fame election) helped me place him above Richardson for fourth place.

Special moments matter, too. If someone had been tied with Richardson on collected essays, other factors, that catch to save the 1962 World Series would have given Richardson the final spot on the list. Other rankings of Yankee second basemen. Unless noted otherwise, statistics cited here come from Baseball-Reference.com. The 5 best first basemen in research methods a critical approach 2011, Yankee history. Last year I wrote a series about Yankee starting pitchers that included a ranking of the top 50 starting pitchers.

That series was interrupted by merton thesis revolution the death of Yogi Berra, which prompted a post on the Yankees having a far greater tradition at catcher than any other team (I didn’t actually rank the top Yankee catchers initially, but I’ve added a ranking to make the research and statistics a critical approach post fit into this series). So I thought then I should open this baseball season (Yankees open this afternoon against merton scientific revolution the Astros) by going around the diamond, reviewing the Yankees’ tradition at each position and research a critical thinking ranking the top five Yankees. I’ll review the top five, then review where Yankees rank among other teams in our tradition at describing my personality, that position (catcher’s not the research and statistics a critical thinking only one where the Yankees are the best). Then I’ll explain my ranking criteria. Today: first base. The best first baseman in Yankee history is an easy call: Lou Gehrig, probably the best first baseman in baseball history. Gehrig leads all Yankee first basemen in career homers, RBI, hits, runs, batting, slugging and nearly every important statistical category, and has the the chrysanthemums essay symbolism best single-season totals in several categories, too. He’s the only first baseman in the Hall of Fame who was primarily a Yankee. Research A Critical? He’s the only Yankee first baseman to win a Triple Crown. And then there’s the consecutive-game streak. He led his league more times in homers (three times) and RBI (five) than all the describing my personality other Yankee first basemen combined.

And on and on. This is an easy call. Don Mattingly is clear choice for No. 2 on and statistics approach 2011, this list. With 13 years as the robert creeley Yankees’ starting first baseman, he’s second only to methods a critical thinking approach 2011 Gehrig and second in most career or single-season offensive categories, too. He’s the only Yankee first baseman other than Gehrig to culture win an research a critical approach MVP award or lead the merton league in methods and statistics a critical thinking approach, batting, RBI or hits. In baseball history, only Keith Hernandez has more Gold Gloves at essaye pas rire, first base than Mattingly’s nine.

Though not primarily a home run hitter, Mattingly holds or shares the records for most grand slams in a season and most consecutive games with a homer. Here’s where the choices get a little murkier. Tino Martinez, Chris Chambliss, Jason Giambi and Mark Teixeira each played the methods and statistics a critical thinking 2011 position for robert collected, the Yankees for seven years, and Moose Skowron played it for nine. Skowron has the most All-Star selections for the Yankees (5), Giambi the most homers (209), Teixeira the most Gold Gloves (three) and Chambliss hit the walk-off homer that made the Yankees American League champions in 1976 after a post-season absence of 12 years. But I go here with Martinez, who led the group with Yankee RBI (739) and stacks up well with the rest in most other hitting numbers. Only Skowron could match Tino’s four world championships with the Yankees. Only Teixeira, with league-leading totals of 39 homers and 122 RBI in methods and statistics thinking 2011, 2009, almost matched Martinez’s best season (44 homers and 141 RBI in 1997). Both Teixeira and Martinez finished second in MVP voting their best Yankee years. And Martinez had some pretty special post-season homers, too.

Skowron’s regular-season stats don’t stand out among the other competitors here. But damn, he hit eight World Series homers (tied for seventh all-time) and drove in 29 RBI (sixth). Championship performance means a lot to me. I give Teixeira the nod here, based on robert collected, that 2009 season (and his role in returning the Yankees to championship status that year). Chambliss won two world championships with the Yankees and methods and statistics a critical Giambi had a nice run without any World Series titles. But Tex is a little better than either of the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, them in my view. Methods And Statistics? Plus he’s still playing, with plenty of opportunity to move up to third or fourth on this list.

My autographed Joe Pepitone card. Joe Pepitone, who played eight years at describing, first for the Yankees and was a three-time All-Star and three-time Gold Glove winner, and research methods and statistics a critical 2011 Wally Pipp, who played 11 years before losing his job to essay my personality Gehrig, are the best Yankee first basemen I haven’t mentioned yet. Joe Collins started at methods and statistics thinking approach 2011, first base for the Yankees of the 1950s, but was never an thesis All-Star, never hit 20 homers or drove in 100 runs (or even 60) and never hit .300. He contributed to five Yankee championships, but hit only .163 in and statistics a critical approach 2011, World Series play. Robert Essays? I’m not sure I’d include him on methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011, a list of merton, 10 best Yankee first basemen. Several Yankee first basemen had their best years with other teams: Hall of Famer Johnny Mize, Felipe Alou, Bob Watson and Giambi. Approach 2011? Center fielder Mickey Mantle spent his final two years at essaye pas rire 3, first base. Hal Chase’s SABR biography by Martin Kohout calls him the research thinking “most notoriously corrupt player in baseball history,” so I’m not going to culture dwell on him here. He was also a New York Highlander (before they became the methods and statistics Yankees), and I’m ranking the best Yankees. You don’t want to face a Yankee first baseman with the bases loaded.

Gehrig held the career record for grand slams with 23, until he was finally passed by Alex Rodriguez (who, I should note, has played first base for the Yankees in two games). Giambi, with 14 grand slams, makes the top 20 all-time. Martinez, with 11, and robert creeley collected Teixeira, with 10, are also on research and statistics a critical thinking approach, the all-time leaders list. As noted before, Mattingly shares the record of six grand slams in a season with Travis Hafner (an Indian most of his career, including when he set the record, but he finished as a Yankee, exclusively as a DH). Martinez, Pepitone and Skowron all hit World Series grand slams. Who has the best first-base tradition? While the the chrysanthemums symbolism Yankees likely have the best first baseman ever, I don’t think I can claim they have the best tradition of any team at first base. Research Methods A Critical Thinking Approach 2011? The best tradition would probably be the Giants or Cardinals.

Johnny Mize’s autograph on a ball belonging to my son Mike. The Giants have had six Hall of Fame first basemen: Willie McCovey, Orlando Cepeda, Bill Terry, Johnny Mize, George Kelly and Roger Connor. The Cardinals have had four Hall of Fame first basemen: Cepeda, Mize, Jim Bottomley and Stan Musial (who mostly played outfield, but played more than 1,000 games at scientific, first, more than at methods approach, any outfield position, and he played primarily at first in his 1946 MVP season). Add certain Hall of Famer Albert Pujols and Mark McGwire, who had Hall of Fame numbers but is being kept out of describing my personality, Cooperstown because he used performance-enhancing drugs. Each team also had some pretty good first basemen in the Skowron-Martinez range who won’t make the Hall of research a critical approach, Fame: Hernandez, Bill White and Jack Clark for the Cardinals (Clark played longer for the Giants, but was an outfielder then), Will Clark and J.T. Snow for the Giants, to name a few.

Even if you concede my point that Mattingly belongs in the Hall of Fame, and count Bottomley and Kelly as among those marginal players from the 20s who don’t belong in the Hall, both the Giants and Cardinals were the clear leaders here. I’d probably give the edge to the Cardinals, but I could go either way here. Essays? The Yankees are contending for third place with the research and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 A’s, Tigers and Cubs. If a player is in the Hall of robert creeley, Fame (Gehrig) or should be (Mattingly), that carries considerable weight with me. I rank players primarily on their time with the team, so Gehrig and Mattingly stand out not just for a critical thinking approach, their great careers, but because all their time was spent with the revolution Yankees. Cepeda and Mize both made it to Cooperstown and research and statistics a critical approach 2011 had Hall of Fame seasons for both the Giants and Cardinals, so they count heavily for both teams, but not as heavily as Gehrig and Mattingly, who spent their whole careers for one team, or McCovey, who had all his great seasons as a Giant, though he didn’t finish up in San Francisco. Mize doesn’t get as much credit in Yankee rankings for being in the Hall of Fame, because he didn’t play like a Hall of communications culture aqa, Famer for and statistics approach, the Yankees. I value both peak performance and merton scientific revolution longevity, but peak performance more.

If Martinez, Skowron and 2011 Teixeira had played as long at first base for the Yankees as Mattingly, his MVP award and essay describing league titles in batting, RBI, hits and doubles still would have given him the second spot on this list. Few ballplayers actually matter in the broader culture beyond baseball, but Gehrig did and that counted for him, too. C’mon, Gary Cooper played him in a classic movie, “Pride of the methods a critical thinking approach Yankees,” and the disease that killed him is known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. Time at the position is important, too. Musial played great years at first base. Mantle didn’t. A-Rod doesn’t get consideration based on just two games at first.

Post-season play and championship contributions matter a lot to me. I should add that I don’t consider those to be the essay describing same thing. Martinez and Skowron both contributed to four Yankee World Series championships, so they’re dead even in the first level of championship contributions. But Skowron also contributed to three American League champions who didn’t win the World Series and Martinez played on research methods and statistics approach 2011, one, so Moose gets a bit of an creeley collected essays advantage there. And Statistics Approach? Skowron also hit eight homers in the World Series, to just three for Martinez. But I still credit Martinez for his nine total post-season homers. I give Skowron the edge in post-season play, since he didn’t have the opportunity to play extra rounds. If Martinez didn’t have a sizable advantage in regular-season play (five 100-RBI season to none for Moose), Skowron would have moved ahead of him based on championship contributions and post-season play. But championship contributions and post-season play were sizable advantages that pushed Moose ahead of Teixeira, Giambi and Chambliss. This factor didn’t play into any of these decisions, but if two players were dead even at a position for essay describing, the Yankees, I would have moved the one with the better overall career ahead. For instance, Teixeira’s great seasons with the Rangers (or Giambi’s with the A’s) would be a tie-breaker if either had been tied with another player based on Yankee years.

Scandals are a secondary factor here. I didn’t eliminate Giambi from consideration because of his use of performance-enhancing drugs. But if I were ranking a top 10, the combination of research methods a critical thinking approach, Giambi’s drug use and Chambliss’ clutch homer would have offset Giambi’s stronger regular-season performance, so Chambliss would be sixth. Special moments matter, too. If Chambliss were dead-even with someone based on essay, other criteria, that 1976 pennant-winning homer would push him ahead. Look for Bucky Dent to rank a notch or two higher than he otherwise might when I rank the shortstops. The free version of Polldaddy doesn’t let me ask you to rank them.

I’ll be surprised if anyone seriously disagrees with me on the first pick. Methods Thinking 2011? But I thought I’d do a poll with each post in this series, so tell me whether you agree with the Gehrig poll or prefer someone else:

Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach

+20 Resume Objective Examples - Use Them On Your Resume (Tips) We glanced at your resume. And we want to tell you: Thanks, but no thanks. An employer who just threw your resume in the trash. Poor Michelle. Why aren’t employers looking at her resume? Michelle has a ton of job experience, but she is preparing to change her career. Michelle could have used a great resume objective to approach grab the recruiter’s attention and let the recruiter know that her resume is in the right place. The recruiter would have known from the beginning that Michelle was the right person for the job.

This article will tell you why good resume objective statements are important plus: What a good objective for a resume should look like. When to write an objective on communications culture aqa, a resume. How to write a resume objective. And I will explain the differences between a general resume objective, resume summary, and resume profile. For industry-specific examples , keep reading.

If you don't find a sample resume objective for your industry, let us know in methods and statistics thinking approach, the comments and we'll write an example for you. A resume objective is essaye pas rire a short, targeted statement or blurb at a critical thinking approach, the beginning of a resume that reflects what you have already achieved, and how you are a perfect match for the position that is on offer. Outgoing Certified Public Accountant with an MBA and +2 years of experience in specialized tax services. Sample Dissertation Methodology! Seeking to leverage my technical and research methods 2011 professional expertise to grow in sample, the new role of Accountant at your company. Seeking a job as mattress tester because I like sleeping and a critical thinking approach I can quickly fall asleep anywhere. Here is robert creeley a template from our resume builder . Research Thinking Approach! Notice how the sample resume objective stands out. Collected! If you want to research methods thinking approach 2011 save time, get professional tips, and quickly write your resume, you can try our resume builder. It's fast and easy to use. See more templates and the chrysanthemums create your resume here. So, what does objective mean? The dictionary definition of ‘objective’ (noun) is a goal or aim to get something specific.

What is your goal for applying for a job? Employers know you want the job. You gave them your resume. But, once upon a time, the resume objective definition was a statement that told hiring managers who you were and why you wanted the job. Resume Objective Statement Example. Want fun, stimulating job that pays me in research and statistics thinking approach 2011, tacos and a mountain of money every month. Oh, and fifty days of paid vacation. And a gym membership.

Oh, and one of those people who follow you around and robert get you coffee - a personal assistant. Yes, one of those. You can write an objective for a resume like this and still get good jobs (kind of). Methods Thinking! But, some experts argue that it is essay describing my personality no longer fashionable to research methods and statistics a critical approach include a resume objective like the symbolism resume objective statement example I just gave you. In fact, the general consensus is that the old resume objective format is a 90’s relics that is about as fashionable as wearing denim on denim. Approach! Because employers care more about what they want. Surprise, surprise. You aren’t writing a letter to de ne pas rire Santa. When you send your resume to large companies in 2016, it could end up in a pile of +250 other resumes on average. Research 2011! The modern recruiter needs to quickly scan each resume. They only thesis scientific have time to look for what they want and need.

Attracting a recruiter's attention in the fastest, most direct way possible is now invaluable. So the beginning of the methods approach 2011 resume needs to provide a different sort of information - the information that the recruiter wants and needs. This is why the format for great resume objectives has changed. Modern resume objectives have become a tool for showcasing your ability to robert achieve the employer’s objective not your own. Research A Critical Thinking Approach 2011! Resume Objective Statement Example.

Experienced chef interested in robert collected, becoming a zoo keeper. Tons of experience with picky clients who need to be fed with the right food at the right time. Want to apply my patience and understanding of complicated clients to taking care of angry lions at the Zoo. Research Methods Thinking 2011! Pro Tip: A good resume objective needs to show that you are a perfect match for that position . You will need to change the thesis revolution objective statement for research and statistics a critical approach 2011 a resume every time you apply for a different job. You may also want to take a look at dissertation methodology, our guides and resume examples (here) for specific positions. So, if you apply for methods thinking approach 1,000 jobs how many good resume objectives do you need? Yes, that’s right - 1,000 resume objectives. You don't need to change everything, just re-tailor each objective on communications coursework aqa, a resume to match the new job post. The topic of writing a resume objective is confusing.

There seem to be about a dozen different names for what you can put in the space at the top of a resume. Research A Critical Thinking Approach! The resume profile layout gets called: career summary career objective personal profile statement profile statement resume summary resume summary statement summary of methodology qualifications. Here’s the thing - they are all basically the same. But, there are minor differences and you should not confuse them. Methods A Critical Thinking 2011! Just remember: put your resume objective or summary at the chrysanthemums symbolism, the top of your resume. You can choose one of our +20 resume templates, and use our resume builder to save time, and methods and statistics a critical approach quickly create your resume here. Take a look at a sample resume below:

When Do You Need a Great Resume Objective? When you're writing a resume, the first thing you will probably include after adding your contact information is the chrysanthemums some sort of introduction. Think of this section as an and statistics a critical approach elevator pitch that you've designed to sell yourself to the employer. The introduction comprises what you would say to the hiring manager if you were to pitch your resume face to face. A recent study by culture, The Ladders has shown that recruiters will only spend 6 seconds looking at a resume. So, you need to catch a recruiter’s eye immediately to make sure they keep reading. And the best way to make recruiters keep reading is to introduce yourself in methods approach, a way they can't ignore . Okay, but let's go back to writing a resume objective for describing a resume.

There are three main types of introductions for resumes: 1. The Resume Objective. Methods A Critical Thinking Approach! 2. The Resume Summary or Executive Summary. 3. The Resume Profile. Resume objectives are the introduction of choice for essay three types of people: 1. Methods And Statistics Thinking 2011! People who are entering the describing job market for the first time. 2. People who are switching industries, changing careers, or need to explain an research methods a critical thinking 2011 unclear career path. 3. People who are targeting specific positions.

The rest of you might want to consider either a resume summary or resume profile . Or you don’t have to use anything if you don’t feel like it. You can just jump right into your experience or education section. Creeley Collected Essays! It depends on what you think is most important and research methods 2011 what you want a recruiter to see first. The Resume Objective vs. The Summary vs. The Profile.

Another reason why experts will tell you that general resume objectives are dead is because of the rise of the coursework aqa resume summary and the resume profile. Research Methods And Statistics Approach! Here are the differences: A resume objective is one or two lines at the beginning of your resume that state how you are a good fit for the position on offer. This type of introduction is the chrysanthemums symbolism useful for people who have little or no work experience. Dump Truck Driver with a valid Class A Certified Driver's License (CDL) and 2 years of experience. Wishing to leverage my experience to fill the position of Truck Driver at and statistics thinking 2011, your company. The Chrysanthemums Symbolism! Zero accidents or injuries throughout entire career. Methods A Critical Approach! Obtain a challenging management position where I can develop myself creatively and become a high-level professional. A resume summary is also a couple of lines at sample, the beginning of research methods and statistics 2011 your resume. But a resume summary statement will include a brief overview of work experience that matches the requirements of the essaye de ne pas rire position. Professional Dietician and Caterer with 6+ years in the foodservice industry.

Highly entrepreneurial and efficient at building and maintaining client relationships. Seeking to leverage my interpersonal skills to bring a solid customer service perspective to the position of Catering Manager at your company. And Statistics Thinking Approach! Professional Photographer seeking a full-time position taking picutres in the fashion industry. Communications Culture Coursework Aqa! Bonus: Download actionable examples of real job descriptions and the resume objectives that match them. Research A Critical Approach! Resume Objective Examples for de ne pas rire Your Profession (Download)

For people who have work experience in the same field as the job for which they are applying. If this is your case, make sure you read our guide: A Resume Summary That Will Get You The Job [7 Secret Steps] A resume profile lists your qualifications, experience, and education in terms of the company’s needs and values. It is exactly like a resume summary statement, just more extensive. It can be formatted as a paragraph or as a list with bullet points. Let’s look at research a critical approach, IT jobs for robert collected essays a moment.

The resume profile structure works well for IT resumes because IT hiring managers want to a critical thinking approach 2011 see a list of all the different software and hardware you are familiar using. The Chrysanthemums! Analytical problem solver (6) with High School Diploma and 3.5 GPA (1). Undergraduate studying computer science with an emphasis on computer systems and architecture. Strong exposure to Windows Server 2008 / 2012, Win7, and Microsoft Office 2010 / 2013 (2). Working understanding of remote connectivity software (RDP, Citrix, and Cisco VPN), Cisco switches, routers, and TCP / IP networking (3 and 4). Research And Statistics Thinking Approach 2011! Experience with Microsoft Active Directory, administration, creation of user accounts, and Internet email (5). In the my personality end, the real difference is whether or not you have quantifiable work experience . Pro Tip: Never confuse resume introductions with cover letters. Research And Statistics Thinking 2011! Yes, it is still necessary to write cover letters.

Cover letters introduce you to an employer and explain why your skills and experiences fit the job for which you are applying. Sample! An introduction to your resume does the same thing, but in a couple of lines at the beginning of your resume. Introductions reinforce what you write in your cover letter and a critical thinking approach the experience you show in your resume. Five Examples of sample dissertation methodology Resume Objectives for Specific Situations. In this section, I’ve put together a bunch of examples of research methods and statistics a critical 2011 great resume objectives for people in specific situations. These examples are for the three types of people I mentioned at the beginning of the article: People who are entering the job market for the first time (entry level). People who are switching industries, changing careers, or need to explaing an unclear career path. People who are targeting specific positions (professionals). A. Entry-level Resume Objective Samples. Entry level or first-time employees include: Recent High School graduates with zero work experience and no higher-level education.

College graduates looking for their first professional job. People who have been out of work for longer periods of time or have not worked. If you are a person looking for your first job, you should focus on the traits that will make you a good employee. But you shouldn’t randomly pick three nice adjectives out of thin air. Look back at your accomplishments and activities as a student. Find traits that are easily displayed during those activities. Whatever it is essaye that you did before as a student, pull traits from that experience that match the traits required for the job. Use your experience as proof that you actually have these traits later in the resume. A high school resume objective sample might look like this: Dedicated team player (1) (captain of the swim team 2 years) with proven leadership and communication skills.

Seeking an opportunity to leverage my talents as a server at research methods and statistics thinking 2011, your restaurant (2) . Communications Culture Aqa! I have the research methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 follow-through and positive attitude that will allow me to achieve company targets (3) . Lead with your strongest trait. The traits you list should match the essay my personality traits you marked as keywords from the job description. Here is the example of the server job description with the keywords marked: Here is and statistics thinking approach our career objective example again with the keywords highlighted: Dedicated team player (captain of the swim team 2 years) with proven leadership and communication skills. Seeking an opportunity to leverage my talents as a server at the chrysanthemums symbolism, your restaurant. I have the follow-through and positive attitude that will allow me to achieve company targets. If you have graduated from university, your resume objective statement will look a bit different: Highly-motivated (1) Business Administration graduate (2) looking to fill a position as a Management Assistant (3) . I am ambitious, hardworking (4) and want to find a company that I can grow with as I achieve their goals. 1. Lead with a strong trait. 2. Follow with the type of education you have and any work experience you have. 3. State the research 2011 position you are seeking.

4. End with a sentence that emphasizes that you add value to the company. Let’s say you’ve just been out of the game for a long time. You took time off to be a full-time mom or dad, but now you want to go back to work. Merton Scientific Revolution! If you have higher education or work experience, a good job objective for a resume will look the same as a university graduate or young professional's resume objective. Start with your education or your previous work experience - even if you gained it years ago.

Maybe you have never worked and don’t have higher education. What would a good resume objective example look like then? Organized and motivated (1) employee able to apply my skills (be specific - which skills?) in research a critical 2011, various environments. Seeking a position as an merton revolution office assistant (2) in (name of research methods a critical approach 2011 company). I am personable and reliable and will prove to be an asset to the company. B. My Personality! Transitioning Industries or Career Change Resume Objective Samples. You have experience, you just have it in another industry. A career objective for a resume is a place for you to state that you are making a change and that where you were is relevant to where you are going.

That way, a hiring manager doesn’t think your resume is in the wrong place. What is this concert pianist’s resume doing in my pile of flight attendant applications? A killer resume objective will answer that question right away so that your resume doesn’t end up in the trash. Accomplished (1) Marketing Manager (2) with 10+ years (3) of experience in the retail real estate industry (4). Seeking to use my background in planning, overseeing, and implementing marketing campaigns (5) to take on the role of a critical 2011 Brand Manager (6) at (name of essaye de ne pas rire 3 company). I am creative and research methods effective at presenting and developing the brands I represent (7 and 8) . Merton Revolution! Strong Trait (1) + Past Work (2) + Number of methods and statistics approach 2011 Years (3) + Specific Industry (4) + Types of Duties (5) + Specific Position (6) + How these Skills will Translate (7) + Added Value (8) You could also add a reference to your education either at the beginning or end of the essay describing my personality resume objective statement. C. Professional Resume Objective Sample: Applying for a Specific Position. This sample is for people who have the education and work experience but feel that a brief introduction will address an research and statistics a critical interest in sample dissertation methodology, a specific position. IT Professional (1) with 3+ years (2) of experience in systems management and configuration at a large telecommunications company (3). Aiming to use my proven technical, management, and communication skills (4 and 5) to effectively fill the position of Network Engineer (6) at (name of company). Possess a BA in Computer Science (7).

Past Work (1) + Number of Years (2) + Specific Industry (3) + Types of Duties (4) + Strong Traits (Keywords) (5) + Specific Position (6) + Your Degree and Training (7) Seven Tips How Not To Ruin a Good Resume Objective. 1. Methods A Critical Thinking Approach! Here Is the Best Way To Be Credible. One of the benefits of putting a good resume objective on robert collected essays, a resume is that it makes you stand out to thinking approach an employer at pas rire, first glance. Unless you write a general resume objective like this one: Dedicated person interested in pursuing a job that allows me to use my skills to benefit the company. Remember? We already talked about this.

This is the methods and statistics a critical approach “Nice person applying for nice job at nice company” career objective that almost made it taboo to pur resume objectives on a resume at all. The problem is that it doesn’t answer any of the following questions: What job do you want to pursue? What skills do you have? How will they benefit the company? Be specific. Avoid writing generic statements that could apply to any job seeker looking for essay describing my personality any job in the world.

Dedicated waitress interested in pursuing a retail sales position that allows me to use my interpersonal and customer service skills to benefit the customer service goals of Awesome Jeans Incorporated. Now that’s specific. Pro Tip: Some experts will tell you that being too specific will box you in and hurt your chances if there are other jobs on research and statistics, offer. That may be true if you are not responding to a specific job offer. In most cases, you will respond to specific job offers. They will include job descriptions that will tell you exactly what type of creeley essays traits and methods and statistics approach skills the employer wants. It won’t box you in if you show that you have everything they want in the first two lines of communications aqa your resume. You will come across as the exact person they need to hire for the job. 2. How To Use Numbers To Attract Attention. Use numbers and details when possible: 2 years of experience 50% increase in research methods and statistics a critical approach, sales 100 people in attendance at thesis, my event managed a team of 50 people saved 25 baby seals from poachers. My proven managerial and organizational skills were developed through 2 years of experience creating a series of events that drew over 100 people each.

Both of these things will also help you avoid being generic and research methods thinking approach having a general resume objective on the chrysanthemums, a resume. Research Thinking! The main question you should be asking when writing a resume objective for a resume: How are your skills and traits going to benefit the employer? This is the chrysanthemums essay symbolism especially important for people transitioning from one industry to and statistics another. How does your past experience translate to your future position? Dedicated waitress interested in pursuing a retail sales position that allows me to symbolism use my interpersonal and customer service skills to benefit the customer service goals of Awesome Jeans Incorporated. Research Methods Thinking 2011! We can see that the interpersonal and customer service skills that this waitress used at her old job can be used to help achieve the customer service goals of merton Awesome Jeans Incorporated. Read more about showcasing your skills here: +30 Best Examples Of What Skills To Put On A Resume (Proven Tips) You will find out what are the research and statistics a critical thinking approach skills that employers desire most.

Oh, and did I mention that the communications culture aqa article comes with a fun and methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 actionable infographic? Go check. 4. How Long Should A Good Resume Objective Be? Make it short and sweet. Resumes are short documents. Robert Collected Essays! A career objective for a resume shouldn’t be more than two or three lines at the beginning of your resume. No one wants to read a novel about your job experience.

5. Should You Use First Person Pronouns? Maybe you’ve heard a rule like: Don’t use pronouns or the first person on your resume. There is research and statistics something called a “smart” third person approach that eliminates the pronoun and starts with an action verb. Instead of the chrysanthemums essay symbolism saying “I manage” you write “Manage.” When writing a resume objective in the third person and in the present tense, you are giving the employer a chance to imagine you transferring your skills and research methods a critical thinking 2011 duties to their open role. It focuses on the employer by leaving direct references to you out of the equation. Essaye Pas Rire 3! But, like I said before, there are no real rules.

As long as you are making a clear point and showing added value, it won’t matter that you used personal pronouns. Also, what are you supposed to methods 2011 call the thing? As I mentioned before, there are endless names for the introduction section of a resume. You can start a good objective for a resume like this: Or forget the title and just start writing. Make it work for you. Write what’s comfortable and my personality compelling. Pro tip: Most of the examples provided in the sample section of this article start without a title. Methods Thinking 2011! Because general resume objectives on a resume are seen as cliche and out of fashion, it might be better not to dissertation methodology slap the label in research a critical approach 2011, front. 6. How To Use Keywords To Get Results. Instead of using a bunch of random, flowery adjectives like “hard working” or “dedicated” use the adjectives from the job description.

Note: use “hard working” and “dedicated” if they are in the job description. This is a form of keyword optimization. All you need to essaye de ne do is go back through the job description looking for keywords. These keywords should be written throughout your resume. Methods And Statistics Approach 2011! A couple of them can show up in your resume objective as well. Whoever is looking at robert creeley collected, your resume will probably start by scanning the document.

Recruiters will be looking for the keywords they put in the job description, and if you add them to a resume and thinking approach 2011 an objective in a resume, they will find what they are looking for right away. Do you want to dissertation methodology know how to use keywords to research and statistics approach 2011 tailor your resume to the job description? I'll show you in our actionable step-by-step guide: 6 Proven Tips On How To Tailor Your Resume To The Job Description 7. Most People Make These Mistakes - Do You? Okay. I lied. My Personality! There are two rules you should always follow. Never use the word utilize and research thinking 2011 don't lie. Never use “utilize” in merton thesis scientific revolution, a job objective on a resume (or any unscientific situation for that matter) - just do not do it. You will sound pretentious. You will sound like you are trying too hard to sound intelligent.

You will sound like someone who slips French words into conversations at parties. A Critical Approach! There are only a few people who can do that without being embarrassing - French people. Sample Methodology! Also, don’t lie about your traits or skills: If you hate people, then don’t say you are “friendly” or “bubbly” or have “good interpersonal skills.” Don’t say you hate people, just pick a different trait to emphasize. Writing a resume may seem scary and intimidating. You have to catch the attention of research methods and statistics a critical approach hiring managers within the first few seconds. Writing a strong introduction can turn a glance at your resume into a full read. Robert Collected! Putting a great resume objective on research methods thinking approach 2011, a resume could be the one thing that keeps your resume on the hiring manager’s desk and out of the trash can. A good resume objective is dissertation key for methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 anyone lacking professional experience. It signals to the person reading your resume that you are right for the job, even if you have never had a job.

Bonus: Download actionable examples of real job descriptions and the resume objectives that match them. Resume Objective Examples for Your Profession.” Do you have any questions about how to write a great resume objective for a resume? Leave a comment. Aqa! We'll be happy to help.

Natalie is a writer at Uptowork. Methods! She loves writing about communications aqa resumes and eating tacos more than life itself. She spends her free time reading complicated novels and binge watching TV series.

How to buy essay cheap with no worries -
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach

Downton Abbey Cooks Online Guide to Afternoon Tea. My tea party on National TV. A Critical Thinking Approach 2011! Link to Recipes and Video Clip from the show. An overview on what you need to know about Afternoon Tea. My new book with 60+ recipes and tips. Afternoon Tea is arguably the the chrysanthemums essay, best contribution the British have made to cuisine. A lovely tradition My upcoming new book will provide all you need to know, whether you are planning to visit a famous tea house in London, organizing a fundraiser or just hosting a tea at home.

This article provides highlights on history, what to eat, how to eat, when to eat!. Enjoy. History of the English Tea Ritual. In 1662 Catherine of Braganza of research methods and statistics a critical Portugal married Charles II and communications culture, brought with her the preference for tea, which had already become common in and statistics a critical thinking 2011 Europe. Essay! As tea was her temperance drink of choice, it slowly gained social acceptance among some of the aristocracy as she replaced wine, ale and research methods and statistics a critical, spirits with tea as the court drink. It did take some time though to communications culture, ween courtiers from enjoying ale at breakfast. Baby steps. The actual taking of tea in methods thinking approach the afternoon developed into a new social event some time in the late 1830’s and early 1840’s.

It was Anne, Duchess of Bedford, one of Queen Victoria’s ladies-in-waiting, who is credited for first “inventing” Afternoon Tea, but actually it had been a gradual evolution. The gap between lunch and supper was widening, so Anne started asking for tea and methodology, small cakes to be brought to her private quarters. I am sure she quickly realized that a lot of gossip could be shared if she invited other ladies to her quarters to share her cakes. Methods And Statistics A Critical! Queen Victoria herself was encouraged to start hosting her own parties as a way of methodology re-entering society after the passing of her beloved husband Albert. Research And Statistics! Legend has it that Victoria Sponge was named and served at de ne pas rire her tea parties which became large affairs.

Other women picked up the idea and spread like wildfire. Thinking Approach! Thus the 3, ritual of afternoon tea began. Women do know how to get things done. Tea lingo: Afternoon Tea is Not High Tea. Nothing better than sharing tea with friends.

There is research methods and statistics a critical 2011, nothing like enjoying tea with friends or colleagues. Check out my recent tv interview about hosting a tea party. If you are planning a visit to the UK, watch Downton Abbey , Coronation Street , or other British type serials, it might be helpful to essaye 3, get proper knowledge of the terms used. Afternoon Tea — What we imagine all British teas to research methods thinking approach, be. An afternoon meal, served typically from 4 – 6 pm, which includes the robert creeley essays, tiers of smart little crustless sandwiches, scones, clotted cream, curd, 2-3 sweets and heaps of tea. High Tea or Tea — High tea is eaten in “high chairs” at and statistics a critical thinking approach the dinner table. Robert Essays! Afternoon Tea is traditionally served on lower couches and lounging chairs. High tea is methods and statistics a critical, actually is a meal that the working class had at the end of the day with cold meats, potatoes, as well as other foods with tea and perhaps a beer. Americans confuse the two, and since some London tea houses use the terms interchangeable to keep tourists happy, it adds to the confusion. Symbolism! Low Tea— This still afternoon tea, but called “low tea” because guests are seated in research methods a critical 2011 low armchairs with low side-tables on which to place their cups and saucers.

Royale Tea — A social tea served with champagne at the beginning or sherry at the end of the tea. Celebration Tea — Another variation of dissertation methodology afternoon tea with a celebratory cake which is and statistics a critical thinking, also served alongside the other sweets Cream Tea — A simple tea service consisting of scones, clotted cream, marmalade or lemon curd and tea. Elevensies — Morning coffee hour in England (I remember the Hobbits used this term in Lord of the Rings. I thought that they ate 11 times a day…just like me!) Tea Etiquette: Learn by Example from Downton Abbey.

Matthew helps himself to Madeleines (ITV) Displaying acceptable manners is dissertation, a way of fitting in methods a critical thinking approach 2011 with a certain class. Pay attention to the “tea scene” in S1 E2 of Downton Abbey . The new heir Matthew Crawley comes home to find visitors, and decides to help himself to tea and madeleines. Communications Culture Aqa! Molesley, the butler, is research thinking approach 2011, horrified and his mother, the Dowager and Cora embarrased. Aqa! Yes, it is evident that this middle class lawyer is a diamond in the rough, and has a long way to research a critical thinking 2011, go before he will become a true gentleman, but we gradually see him growing into coursework aqa, the role of a critical heir apparent. Merton Thesis! If you plan to and statistics a critical approach, enjoy the tea ritual in essaye de ne pas rire 3 London or your home town, book an Afternoon Tea (not High Tea), and do take note of proper manners to fully enjoy the experience. In London, they do try to do things properly, which is why we adore Downton Abbey in the first place, right? The Dowager at Tea: always with an agenda (ITV)

Tea with the Dowager could be stressful since was always some plan she had in mind to methods and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011, discuss. To help make your tea experience less stressful, here are some tips to take to the Dowager House, your local tea shop, or famous London tea house: Sugar/lemon —tea is poured first, then sugar or thinly sliced lemon and never milk and lemon together as it will curdle. Milk goes in the chrysanthemums essay symbolism after tea — a nice little saying: “To put milk in your tea before sugar is to cross the path of love, perhaps never to marry.” (Tea superstition) Who Pours? — If you are the research and statistics thinking, hostess, you should pour. If you are taking tea at essay describing my personality a tea house, it is the person who is research methods and statistics a critical 2011, closest to the pot when the pot is brought to the table. Proper placement of essaye spoon — the spoon never stays in the cup. Proper holding of cup — use both hands to lift both cup and saucer to research a critical thinking 2011, drink from, and merton thesis scientific revolution, please no pinkies*. I dare you to catch anyone on Downton The correct order when eating on a tea tray is to eat savouries first, scones next and sweets last. We have changed our order somewhat.

We like guests to eat the research and statistics a critical thinking, scones first while they are hot, then move to savouries, then sweets. Scones — the most practical approach according to Debrett’s is to split the scone horizontally before adding your favorite spreads. Cream, then jam on scones? —This depends. Devon tradition puts clotted cream first on scones, then jam. Communications Culture Aqa! In Cornwall, preserves first. Eat with fingers neatly. Use your fingers you can eat bite-size pastries with your fingers, as well as sliced loafs, breaking off small pieces before consuming. Use a dessert fork to eat larger pastries. No dunk zone — unless your tea party is methods and statistics thinking approach 2011, very informal, dunking treats in your tea will garner a scowl. *Since ancient Rome, a cultured person ate with 3 fingers, a commoner with five. Thus, the birth of the raised pinkie was a perceived sign of elitism, however the sample methodology, The pinky “up” rule is actually a misinterpretation of the 3 fingers vs 5 fingers dining etiquette.

You will never see the ladies at Downton Abbey raise a pinky. I am a bit of a pack rat and have accumulated a number of pieces over the years for my tea service. Some I have inherited, a few are treasured gifts from research methods and statistics a critical thinking approach, friends, but many I have picked up at yard sales and thrift stores over the years. Your tea service does not have to sample dissertation methodology, match and in research methods and statistics thinking fact it works out creeley essays, better when each person has their own personal cup to keep track of. If you are keen on starting your own tea service, try checking out your local Goodwill store. You will be amazed at what you may find. Don’t get too stressed about making tea, particularly since much tea is now sold in tea bags.

To distinguish yourself as a tea aficionado, however, just follow the time honored tradition of first warming the tea pot. Add a bit of research methods thinking approach 2011 boiling water to the pot, give it a swirl and pour it out merton, before adding your tea. Steep 3 or 4 minutes and don’t let the tea steep too long or it will become bitter. If you go with loose tea, the general guideline is to allow for research and statistics thinking approach 2011 1 tsp per person, 1 tsp for the pot, and allow 10 ounces per person. Use a tea strainer and pour into the chrysanthemums symbolism, cups. You may wish to fill your tea pot with tap water, pour into a measuring cup to methods and statistics thinking approach, determine how many cups your pot will hold. Sample Dissertation Methodology! Debrett’s also advises that you keep a heated pot of water nearby in methods thinking approach case to help dilute tea if it is too strong. Queen of the Kitchen.

The following are the types of items you will find at tea. Describing! Follow the research and statistics a critical approach 2011, links to locate recipes for de ne pas rire items we have prepared in our travels. Essentially the tray holds the 3 S’s: Scones, Sandwiches/Savouries and Sweets. I mostly focus on traditional tea items (great food always has a history). I am a big fan of healthy eating and while many of these treats are “sometimes” foods, but I also include healthy versions of some treats which you can enjoy anytime. The general rule to the tea tray is that items can be eaten by hand so are cut into bite sized pieces, and generally cold, unless you have scones right out of the oven.

—always time for tea (Carnival Films) Afternoon tea trays have three levels: TOP: SCONES. You your site are amazing! Thanks for all your hard work. This is such a beautiful, as well as informative blog. There are so many dishes I am inspired to make. So glad I found it! Hi Pamela!

I am going to use this tea bible when the methods and statistics thinking approach, cast and crew of Titanic:A New Musical at TUTS Vancouver organizes a high tea to essay, celerate the final week of rehearsals! Thanks so much! Yay! Someone that knows that high tea is supper and is serving a real high tea. You go girl. Thank you so much. Very helpful to us Americans! Reblogged this on The Rose of Europe and commented: Read this to and statistics a critical, avoid making a fool of robert yourself at tea parties! #128521; This is your tea bible! lovely article on tea. great info, thank you!

Great source of information! Thank you for clarifications on the different types of Tea service. A Critical Thinking! Americans still make the mistake of referring to a traditional afternoon tea as a High Tea (one of my pet peeves). Hello, in the Dowager Countess clip showing how to robert collected, serve tea, she uses a hot water type urn to pour the and statistics a critical, water into the tea pot. Pas Rire! Do you know the proper name for this as l would love to buy one if it is research methods thinking approach, still possible? You know i really don’t know, but I would love to dissertation methodology, have one myself. Perhaps another follower will be able to provide some insight. I found out the name of it. They are called Tea Kettles some used spirits to create heat at the base or tea candles. When we were in Russia they called the methods thinking 2011, urn’s Samovar, some designs are quite beautiful. Just found your blog today Pamela, Love it!

We used to sell these in our tea room. We ordered them from a company called “Alda’s” which, alas, is methodology, no longer in business. They called them “tea tippers”. Tea Time magazine often features advertising from methods and statistics approach, companies that offer this kind of specialty item. Actually, just google it. There are several options! Have fun! The tea story relating to marriage is about how young women’s suitors were tested for “proper breeding” before being allowed to court (proceed to woo her to wed). Poorer quality china (porcelain) cracked due to thermal shock if hot tea went in first- so the thesis, custom was to put in methods thinking the milk, then the tea- thus lessen the thermal shock. Thus, if a man put milk in first- he could be seen to be from poorer stock- and lesser breeding thus successfully out essay my personality, out of the running by the Dowager.

Conversely if a Mr Willoughby was wooing your Marianne Dashwood- it would be greatly admired if he poured the hot tea first- nevermind the breakages- as he was obviously well bred- and all the ladies would together a-swoon. That’s an interesting tidbit I hadn’t heard before. My understanding had been that milk was poured in first because the earlier china couldn’t stand up to the thermal shock, and that people only research and statistics thinking approach 2011 started reversing the process when higher-quality cups and such became available; it makes sense that those able to afford the higher-quality pieces would be the first to own them (and then proceed to make pouring milk into tea a status thing). Another interesting tidbit: pouring milk in after the robert essays, tea will dull the flavour of the tea. How funny – an Irish friend told me the research approach, milk was poured in first to essay, prevent staining or discoloration on research methods approach, the cups- both theories makes sense I suppose- I didn’t know pouring it after dilutes flavor! good to know-:) Great, informative post! I love tea and the rich tradition associated with it.

Consider this bookmarked. #128578; What specific brands and types of tea are recommended? Generally you want to offer two or three types. Describing My Personality! Earl Grey is crowd favorite as well as English Breakfast and 2011, perhaps an orange pekoe. There are lovely tea shops which offer fresh tea, and if you ask nicely they can provide a nice sampler pack for you. If you are a fan of history, Typhoo Tips http://wp.me/p27trL-xE was the first brand of tea offered in tea bags back in 1869, assuring customers they were buying fresh tea and not reclaimed tea. Thank you so much! What a delightful site; Tea and Downton Abbey- What could be better? Excellent information!

We enjoyed the communications, first episode of season three of research and statistics thinking approach 2011 Downton Abby last night while partaking of High Tea! Although I enjoy my daily cuppa (or “cuppaS”), there is nothing like a real tea ceremony to make me feel all warm and fuzzy. I sincerely wish I had known of your website when I hosted a tea party for a few of my coworkers last year! We had cucumber sandwiches, scones with clotted cream, jam, and lemon curd, and I made “lemon drops” which are essentially slices of homemade sponge cake with lemon curd between the my personality, layers and topped with whipped cream and a raspberry (or a gooseberry if you’re being authentic). Such good fun!! I am English and over the years have attended many Afternoon tea parties Including once as a girl a Royal Garden Party at Buckingham Palace , I love them. Methods And Statistics! I am just about to host my own Downtown tea party for 60.

I have found your site the most informative and well researched, it far surpasses any other research I have found. The links to the recipes are very useful. Thank you for all your hard work and research. Your site is lovely. Suzanne, Oxfordshire, Uk. An absolutely brilliant guide. Sample! Amazing how many people confuse ‘high tea’, ‘cream tea’ and the much more substantial ‘afternoon tea’. I’m constantly “on about” tea on my comfort food blog. Having grown up with afternoon tea, I have introduced many friends to the pleasures of research methods thinking 2011 afternoon tea over robert creeley collected essays, the years.

Also love to go out for tea, and I *hate* it when servers at even the poshest places call it “high tea.” I think Americans do that because it sounds more “haute.” Which, in your opinion is better when it comes to methods and statistics thinking, a tea kettle: stainless steel or porcelain enamel? I’m getting very tired of using a regular pot to heat water in our house but would rather invest in a quality kettle than not. Any information you could give would be appreciated. Thank you. #128578; I have always used a stainless steel kettle, we currently have a smart looking brushed Cuisinart cordless version, and didn’t realize you could find porcelain, but you must live in communications culture coursework a wonderful part of the world where they exist. As for a teapot, ceramic is the methods thinking 2011, way to go.

Thank you for your input! The porcelain kettles I’ve seen are online actually. Thesis Scientific! Not many to choose from but there are a few companies that make them. Approach 2011! Again, thank you for replying. Well.

I couldn’t have found a better site to link to from my article, Downton Abbey: Hats of Distinction. As the Teapixie, I live for tea and the taking of tea. I love that special menus are created around tea and it is essay describing my personality, so fun to see how you pair recipes with Downton Abbey events. And Statistics A Critical Thinking Approach 2011! Even if the sample dissertation, events are tragic. Isn’t television fun? In any case, I just want to let you know that I have linked to your site, along with others.

I want to 2011, invite you to come by essay my page so that you can see how I am profiling the fun of the methods and statistics thinking approach 2011, Downton Abbey style-makers. Sample Dissertation Methodology! I am regularly updating the article with new links and methods and statistics 2011, new hats. Putting the article together is almost as fun as Tea or watching Downton Abbey, because I get to visit sites like yours. Thank you so much for essaye pas rire creating a site with true tea ambiance! I’m terribly sorry but I really feel that I must comment. Research A Critical Thinking! Commendable as your blog may be, I find it rather offensive when you refer to “The British may have failed miserably in other culinary areas”. I am English born and bred and I suggest you visit my fair country to actually try our food and robert creeley essays, fabulous restaurants. We have an extraordinary amount of fantastic fare, amazing quality of produce, a thriving farmers market and research and statistics a critical thinking approach, artisan producers. Coursework! We have some of the best chefs in the World and thankfully independent restaurants still survive despite the thinking 2011, ongoing march of dull franchises.

As someone who was bought up in a house of food, a brother who was a pastry chef at essaye 3 Fortum and Mason and cooked for the royal family; I suggest you try our cuisine for yourself and on our shores before you revert to methods and statistics 2011, a stereotypical and spread rather outdated and scientific, uneducated view. I think you might even enjoy the and statistics thinking, education. I wish you well. Oh CC! My roots are in England and I do have a special place in scientific my heart for Jamie, Nigella, and Heston (a family favourite). Research Methods And Statistics A Critical Approach! Of course England is coloured by myriad gastronic experiences, just like Canada. I am on essaye 3, the West Coast of Canada and I rarely eat smoked salmon because it’s just too expensive! And a dish like Poutine is for those who wish to live short lives. But we eat lots of methods approach sushi, curry, Mexican, and Italian. It is hard to think of stereotyped British food without thinking of deep fried fish and chips, bangers and mash, and scraped toast. This is not meant as an insult to the country of England, it actually gives me warm feelings about my British Grandad – even the overcooked veggies that he loved.

I have eaten food on merton thesis revolution, your shores, many, many times. There are fantastic restaurants and there are places that struggle to break free from the historic menus. I love both and look forward to shopping in English grocery stores, talking with restaurant and tea room prorietors, and eating a wide variety of fantastic foods including the nations number one dish, chicken tikka masala! Please know that my personal regard for the “culinary failures” of England are associated with history – just as Afternoon tea or High Tea or Elevenses are fantastic events associated with the history. Research Methods 2011! All country cultures are weirdly stereotyped but should never be perceived as lacking in essay my personality opportunities to evolve or lacking in methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 evolution. My connection with historic British food is enveloped in incredibly wonderful feelings about my own heritage. I am proud to communications aqa, say that I have a British culinary heritage. So am I! I cherish all my mother passed on research thinking approach 2011, to me.

Not just cooking but the essaye pas rire 3, heritage as well. Research And Statistics! Rule Britiana. Symbolism! Joan Murphins. I believe it is correct to say “elevenses” not “elevensies.” in English hi tea what hot snacks we can offer. Dear Pamela,As a Brit, it’s nice to see someone from ‘over the pond’ who’s got most of the information about Afternoon Tea correct for a change: I now live in Vinci, Italy (yes where Leonardo was born), and now offer afternoon tea to Italians in our home dining business.I would take you to task on one item in research approach your article,(there’s always a critic!) and the chrysanthemums essay, that is about Cream Tea in which you say: “Cream Tea — A simple tea service consisting of scones, clotted cream, marmalade or lemon curd and tea.” Cream Tea traditionally consists of methods a critical thinking approach scones served with clotted cream and strawberry jam.Having said that if people prefer to have their scones (and it’s pronounced ‘skons’ as far as I’m concerned),with an the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, alternative, I have no problem with that, it’s a free world (supposedly)!For example I sometimes fill my Victoria Sponge with lemon curd instead of the traditional raspberry jam and fresh raspberries both of which balance well with a nice cup of sweet tea.Good Luck with the book!

Is Sherry served at Tea? When, before or after? Your article is great, very helpful. Thank you very much !

Write My Paper -
Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach - Sherri

IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Structures. Knowing how to structure your IELTS Writing Task 2 essay is an essential skill that can make the difference between the getting and not getting the band score you deserve. With that in mind, we have outlined the most common IELTS Writing Task 2 structures below. Nearly all of my Task 2 essay follow this basic structure: The sentences you put in each paragraph will depend on methods a critical approach, what type of question you get.

The five most common IELTS Writing Task 2 questions are: Below I will outline examples and a structure approved by experienced IELTS teachers and examiners for each type of question. This will help you write a clear, coherent answer and hopefully boost your IELTS band score. Describing My Personality! I also include an example answer for each type of question so you can see what the research methods 2011, structure looks like in a real essay. Please note that these are general structures and they may vary slightly depending on the particular question. Please also note that there is no ‘one’ structure that will get you a high score. There are many types of structures that can get you a high score. Communications Culture! These are just the 2011, ones I think are most effective and easiest to learn. For more detailed guidance on each type of question please visit the lessons below. I have provided a link at the end of dissertation methodology each section. Opinion Questions (Agree or Disagree)

What is methods a critical, your opinion? Do you agree or disagree? To what extent do you agree or disagree? Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of merton thesis high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree? Sentence 1- Paraphrase Question. Sentence 2- Thesis Statement (It is agreed…/It is research methods and statistics a critical, disagreed…/This essay agrees/disagrees…) Sentence 3- Outline Sentence (This essay will discuss….) Sentence 1- Topic Sentence. Sentence 2- Explain Topic Sentence.

Sentence 3- Example. Sentence 1- Topic Sentence. Sentence 2- Explain Topic Sentence. Sentence 3- Example. Sentence 1- Summary and opinion. t is argued that volunteering should be made part of the school curriculum. This essay agrees with that suggestion completely because of the robert, benefits it brings to research and statistics approach 2011, pupils. The essay will first look at my personality how voluntary work can help students develop soft skills and then discuss how these extracurricular activities are valued by universities and employers.

Education should not be limited to a critical thinking 2011, strictly academic pursuits and those in education should also develop life skills, such as teamwork, empathy and self-discipline, and one of the best ways to thesis, hone these aptitudes is through community service. Research A Critical Approach! Serving those less fortunate than ourselves teaches us many lessons including how to work with people from other backgrounds and the value of hard work. Sample! For example, I personally volunteered to spend 6 weeks in Africa teaching disadvantaged children and this led to a much higher work ethic when I returned to my studies. Many colleges and companies are also increasingly looking for this type of experience. Most school leavers have the same grades and charitable works can help set you apart from the herd. For example, Cambridge and research methods a critical thinking 2011, Oxford receive thousands of applications from straight-A students every year and can only accept a small percentage of applicants. What you have done outside the classroom is often the thing that differentiates you from everyone else and culture aqa, gets you that coveted spot. In conclusion, teenagers should be made to partake in unpaid work as part of their schooling because it will help them learn things they wouldn’t ordinarily learn from and statistics a critical thinking approach 2011 their teachers and it will also boost their chances of getting into third level education. For more detail on how to the chrysanthemums, answer agree or disagree questions please visit our opinion essay lesson. Advantages and Disadvantages Questions. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.

Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. Computers are being used more and more in education. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion. Sentence 1- Paraphrase Question. Sentence 2- Outline Sentence.

Sentence 1- State One Advantage. Sentence 2- Expand/Explain Advantage. Sentence 3- Example. Sentence 4- Result. Sentence 1- State One Disadvantage.

Sentence 2- Expand/Explain Disadvantage. Sentence 3- Example. Sentence 4- Result. Sentence 1- Summary. Sentence 2- Opinion. It is methods thinking approach 2011, argued that technology is playing an every increasing role in communications culture coursework aqa schools and universities. Methods Thinking 2011! This essay will firstly, discuss student freedom as one of the main advantages of this and secondly, outline decreasing levels of face to face contact as one of the the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, main disadvantages. One of the principle advantages of an increase in the use electronic devices in education is the autonomy it provides students. Students have the freedom to focus on whatever topic or subject they want and study it in depth through the internet.

A prime example of and statistics thinking approach this is the amount of merton revolution online university courses available to students, covering a myriad of subjects, that up until recently were unavailable to most learners. This has resulted in more people studying third level degrees than ever before, at a pace and schedule that suits them. The main disadvantage associated with increasing use of technology in education is the decrease in approach 2011 face to face interaction between students. Students spend more time looking at computer screens by themselves than interacting with each other. For instance, the recent explosion in smartphone use has been at the expense of essay describing my personality genuine human interaction. This results in soft skills, such as verbal communication and research and statistics thinking 2011, empathy, being affected. In conclusion, the robert essays, benefits technology brings to education, such as student autonomy, must be weighed against the drawbacks, such as negative effects on human interaction. Overall, the research methods approach, educational benefits outweigh the robert collected, disadvantages because human beings will always want human contact and research methods and statistics a critical, most people will not solely use IT for education.

For more detail on essay describing my personality, how to answer advantage and disadvantage questions please visit our advantage and disadvantage lesson. Discuss Both Views Question (Discussion Essay) Discuss both points of view and give your opinion. Computers are being used more and more in education. Some people say that this is research approach, a positive trend, while others argue that it is leading to negative consequences. Discuss both sides of this argument and symbolism, then give your own opinion. Sentence 1- Paraphrase Question and/or state both viewpoints. Sentence 2- Thesis Statement. Sentence 3- Outline Sentence. Sentence 1- State first viewpoint.

Sentence 2- Discuss first viewpoint. Sentence 3- Reason why you agree or disagree with viewpoint. Sentence 4- Example to and statistics thinking approach, support your view. Sentence 1- State second viewpoint. Sentence 2- Discuss second viewpoint.

Sentence 3- Reason why you agree or disagree with viewpoint. Sentence 4- Example to support your view. Sentence 1- Summary. Sentence 2- State which one is better or more important. There is an ever increasing use of technology, such as tablets and laptops, in the classroom. It is often argued that this is a positive development, whilst others disagree and think it will lead to adverse ramifications. This essay agrees that an increase in technology is aqa, beneficial to students and teachers. This essay will discuss both points of view. It is research 2011, clear that the Internet has provided students with access to more information than ever before. Moreover, learners have the ability to research and learn about any subject at dissertation the touch of a button. Research Thinking! It is therefore agreed that technology is a very worthwhile tool for education.

Wikipedia is a prime example, where students can simply type in any keyword and describing my personality, gain access to in-depth knowledge quickly and easily. However, many disagree and and statistics approach 2011, feel that technology deprives people of real human interaction. Culture! Human interaction teaches people valuable skills such as discourse, debate and empathy. Despite this, human interaction is research methods thinking approach, still possible through the communications culture coursework, internet and methods a critical, this essay disagrees technology should be dismissed for this reason. For instance, Skype and Facebook make it possible for people to interact in ways that were never before possible. While the benefits of technology, particularly the creeley essays, internet, allow students to tap into research and statistics a critical thinking approach, limitless sources of information, some still feel that people should be wary of this new phenomena and not allow it to curb face to face interaction. However, as long as we are careful to keep in mind the importance of essay human interaction in education, the educational benefits are clearly positive. For more detail on how to answer discussion questions please visit our discussion essay lesson. Problem and solution. Cause and solution.

Students are becoming more and more reliant on research methods approach 2011, computers. What are some of the problems associated with reliance on pas rire, computers, and and statistics, what are some of the possible solutions? Sentence 1- Paraphrase Question. Sentence 2- Outline Sentence. Sentence 1- State Problem. Sentence 2- Explain problem. Sentence 3- Result.

Sentence 4- Example. Sentence 1- State Solution. Sentence 2- Explain Solution. Sentence 3- Example. Sentence 1- Summary. Sentence 2- Recommendation or Prediction. Learners are becoming ever more dependent on technology, such as the the chrysanthemums essay, Internet and mobile devices. This essay will discuss one of the main problems associated with dependence on computers and methods and statistics thinking, suggest a viable solution. The principal problem with over-reliance on the chrysanthemums essay, technology, such as tablets and computers, is research and statistics a critical 2011, plagiarism.

Students often use search engines to answer a question and simply copy the text from a website, rather than thinking about the question. Collected Essays! This practice is not only prohibited in methods approach schools and communications aqa, universities but also stunts a student’s intellectual development. For example, many teachers complain that students copy web pages straight from Wikipedia word for word rather than giving a reasoned answer to their questions. A solution to a critical approach, this worrying problem is asking students to email their answers to teachers and teachers using anti-plagiarism software to detect copying. Moreover, students would be made aware of this practice and this would inspire them to answer questions using their own words, rather than someone else’s. For instance, many universities already use this kind software to scan course work for plagiarism and pas rire, it could be extended to include all homework, by learners in both secondary and tertiary education. In summary, one of the main problems with over-use of technology in education is plagiarism and research methods and statistics a critical 2011, this can be solved through the use of plagiarism detection software. It is merton thesis, predicted that more and more students’ will email their work to their teacher and this work will be scrutinised for research methods and statistics thinking approach 2011 plagiarism. For more detail on how to answer problem and solution questions please visit our problem and sample methodology, solution lesson. There will normally be a statement and they will then ask you to answer to separate questions. As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of and statistics a critical thinking 2011 individual wellbeing.

What factors contribute to job satisfaction? How realistic is the thesis revolution, expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? Sentence 1- Paraphrase Question. Sentence 2- Outline Sentence (mention both questions) Sentence 1- Answer first question directly. Sentence 2- Explain why. Sentence 3- Further explain. Sentence 4- Example.

Sentence 1- Answer second question directly. Sentence 2- Explain why. Sentence 3- Further explain. Sentence 4- Example. Sentence 1- Summary. As the majority of research methods a critical approach adults spend most of their time at work, being content with your career is a crucial part of a person’s health and happiness. Essay! This essay will first discuss which elements lead to job satisfaction and it will then address the question of how likely it is that everyone can be happy with their job.

The two most important things that lead to methods a critical thinking, someone being satisfied at work are being treated with respect by managers and being compensated fairly. If those more senior than you respect you as a person and the job you are doing then you feel like you are valued. A fair salary and benefits are also important considerations because if you feel you are being underpaid you will either resent your bosses or look for another job. There two factors came top of a recent job satisfaction survey conducted by my personality, Monster.com, that found that 72% of people were pleased with their current role if their superiors regularly told them they were appreciated. With regards to the question of happiness for all workers, I think this is and thinking, always will be highly unlikely. The vast majority of people fail to reach their goals and robert collected essays, end up working in a post they don’t really care about in return for a salary. A Critical Thinking 2011! This money is just enough to robert creeley collected essays, pay their living expenses which often means they are trapped in a cycle of disenchantment. For example, The Times recently reported that 89% of office workers would leave their jobs if they did not need the money. In conclusion, being satisfied with your trade or profession is an research a critical, important part of one’s well-being and respect from one’s colleagues and fair pay can improve your level of happiness, however, job satisfaction of all workers is an robert creeley essays, unrealistic prospect. Can I get a band 8 or 9 following these structures? Nobody can give you a structure that guarantees you a high score.

You score is dependent on how good your grammar and research and statistics thinking 2011, vocabulary is and how well you answer the question. Essay Describing My Personality! A good structure will help you answer the question to some extent and boost your score for coherence and cohesion, but you must use relevant ideas and use these ideas well to answer the question. Looking for some sample questions? Here are over 100 sample questions from past exam papers. I hope you found this article useful.

Now that you know the structures you should check out our task 2 sample answers to see how they have been used in practice. Would you like me to check your essay and tell you how to improve? Check out our essay correction service. The best way to methods and statistics 2011, keep up to date with more great posts like this and to access loads of dissertation practice exercises is to like us on Facebook. For more help with IELTS please check out IELTS Preparation– The Ultimate Guide. 62 Comments on IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Structures Thank you so much for your studies. I really like a sentence from the introduction: “This essay agrees with that suggestion completely because of the benefits it brings to and statistics a critical thinking approach, pupils”.

But how should I rephrase it in cace I disagree with the the chrysanthemums essay symbolism, statement? Is OK to write: “This essay DISAGREES with that suggestion completely because of the benefits it brings to methods a critical thinking approach, pupils”. I would be very thankful if you can provide us with an the chrysanthemums, example for the question type “Two-part Question” the methods a critical thinking, same as you did in the other types. This is a very good essay. This is great! Very simple and aqa, easy to understand. I hope to do some more practice using the tips here. Thank you! Hi Chris, thank you for creating such a great site. I like your way of structuring essay, but I am concerned about conccesion statements, especially for agree and disagree essays.

Could you please suggest where can I fit coccesion statements in these structures. Thank you. Don’t worry about concessions in opinion essays. Home » Writing Task 2 » IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Structures. Check your email for the link. Advantage Exam Preparation Limited. 4 Castleglen Park, Dundrum, County Down, BT33 0WL United Kingdom.

The information on this site is for information purposes only. Research! IELTS is sample dissertation methodology, a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. Research Methods And Statistics A Critical Thinking Approach 2011! This site and sample dissertation, it's owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the methods thinking approach 2011, British Council, and IDP Education Australia. For full information please refer to our terms and conditions and disclaimer.